AEGIS: A Holistic Benchmark for Evaluating Forensic Analysis of AI-Generated Academic Images (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bo Zhang, Tzu-Yen Ma, Zichen Tang, Junpeng Ding, Zirui Wang, Yizhuo Zhao, Peilin Gao, Zijie Xi, Zixin Ding, Haiyang Sun, Haocheng Gao, Yuan Liu, Liangjia Wang, Yiling Huang, Yujie Wang, Yuyue Zhang, Ronghui Xi, Yuanze Li, Jiacheng Liu, Zhongjun Yang, Haihong E
| Challenge: | AEGIS examines whether current models can effectively audit AI-generated images in academic papers. |
| Approach: | They propose a holistic benchmark for forensic analysis of AI-Generated academic ImageS that reveals limitations in academic image forensics. |
| Outcome: | AEGIS compared with existing benchmarks on seven academic categories and features key advances in forensic analysis. |
Similar Papers
AEGIS2.0: A Diverse AI Safety Dataset and Risks Taxonomy for Alignment of LLM Guardrails (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shaona Ghosh, Prasoon Varshney, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Aishwarya Padmakumar, Traian Rebedea, Jibin Rajan Varghese, Christopher Parisien
| Challenge: | Existing safety-related content safety models are not well-suited for commercial use. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy that can be used to categorize safety risks . it combines human annotations with a multi-LLM "jury" system to assess safety . they plan to open-source Aegis2.0 data and models to aid in safety guardrailing . |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy can be used to assess the safety of human-LLM interactions . it can be trained on large, non-commercial datasets and is open-source . |
A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Keke Lian, Wang Bin, Lei Zhang, Libo Chen, Junjie Wang, Ziming Zhao, Yujiu Yang, Miaoqian Lin, Haotong Duan, Haoran Zhao, Shuang Liao, Mingda Guo, Quan Jiazheng, Yilu Zhong, Chenhao He, Chen Zichuan, Jie Wu, Haoling Li, Zhaoxuan Li, Jiongchi Yu, Hui LI, Dong Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing security evaluation benchmarks lack relevance to real-world AI programming tasks . current LLMs struggle with secure coding, research shows . |
| Approach: | They propose a repository-level evaluation benchmark to assess security of AI-generated code. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework mirrors real-world AI programming tasks and offers valuable insights into the state of AI code generation. |
EssayJudge: A Multi-Granular Benchmark for Assessing Automated Essay Scoring Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiamin Su, Yibo Yan, Fangteng Fu, Zhang Han, Jingheng Ye, Xiang Liu, Jiahao Huo, Huiyu Zhou, Xuming Hu
| Challenge: | Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems face three major challenges: reliance on handcrafted features that limit generalizability, difficulty in capturing fine-grained traits like coherence and argumentation, and inability to handle multimodal contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark to evaluate AES capabilities across lexical-, sentence-, and discourse-level traits without manual feature engineering. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can evaluate AES capabilities across lexical-, sentence-, and discourse-level traits without manual feature engineering. |
Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing MLLMs rely on commercial models such as GPT-4o for evaluations, but they are not universally accessible. |
| Approach: | They propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a specialized training dataset to break down the multifaceted evaluation process into simpler sub-tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o evaluation framework with over 4.6% improvement in Spearman and Kendall correlations with human judgments. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
AICD Bench: A Challenging Benchmark for AI-Generated Code Detection (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for detecting AI-generated code are limited to binary human–machine classification under in-distribution settings. |
| Approach: | They propose to use AICD Bench to build a robust binary classification framework for large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark spans 2M examples, 77 models across 11 families, and 9 programming languages. |
Where Am I From? Identifying Origin of LLM-generated Content (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generative models have produced high-quality content, but they pose security risks . a new framework for deep learning systems enables the tracing of AI-generated content back to its source . |
| Approach: | They propose a digital forensics framework that embeds a secret watermark into the generated output and a "depth watermark" this watermark strengthens the link between content and generator, enabling accurate tracing while maintaining the quality of the generated content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework ensures accurate tracing while maintaining quality of generated content. |
AIGuard: A Benchmark and Lightweight Detection for E-commerce AIGC Risks (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhua Zhang, Weicheng Li, Xuanrong Rao, Lixin Zou, Xiangyang Luo, Chubin Zhuang, Yongjie Hong, Zhen Qin, Hengyu Chang, Chenliang Li, Bo Zheng
| Challenge: | Existing detection methods lack real-world scenarios and corresponding risk datasets . current MLLMs lack knowledge and have limited capability to detect the risk of AIGC content. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for AIGC risk detection in real-world e-commerce . it includes 253,420 image-text pairs across four critical categories . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 9.68% higher recall than leading multimodal models while using only 25% of training resources. |
AttributionBench: How Hard is Automatic Attribution Evaluation? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | generative search engines enhance the reliability of large language model responses by providing cited evidence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a benchmark to evaluate whether a large language model supports the generated responses or not . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that even a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 only achieves around 80% macro-F1 under a binary classification formulation. |
A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Md Amran Hossen Bhuiyan, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Currently, the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT in academic datasets is difficult due to the difficulty of evaluating the generative outputs produced by this model against the ground truth. |
| Approach: | They evaluate ChatGPT across 140 tasks and analyze 255K responses it generates in academic datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on 140 tasks and generates 255K responses in these datasets. |