Exploring Concreteness Through a Figurative Lens (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Static concreteness ratings are widely used in NLP, yet a word’s concreteness can shift with context, especially in figurative language such as metaphor, where common concrete nouns can take abstract interpretations.
Approach: They conduct a layer-wise and geometric analysis of LLM hidden representations across four model families to examine how models distinguish literal vs. figurative usage.
Outcome: The results show that LLMs separate literal and figurative usage in early layers and that mid-to-late layers compress concreteness into a one-dimensional direction consistent across models.

Similar Papers

Grounded Concreteness: Human-Like Concreteness Sensitivity in Vision–Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a long tradition in cognitive science treats concreteness as a graded dimension of conceptual representation . concrete words benefit from richer sensory codes and exhibit robust behavioral advantages over abstract words .
Approach: They compare vision-language models with text-only large language models to test their concreteness . they find that VLMs show more human-like sensitivity to concreteness than LLMs .
Outcome: The proposed model-based training improves on the Llama text backbones and Llma Vision counterparts.
LMs stand their Ground: Investigating the Effect of Embodiment in Figurative Language Interpretation by Language Models (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Figures are based on the use of words in a way that deviates from their conventional order and meaning.
Approach: They propose to use a figurative language model to interpret embodied metaphors by using larger language models that conceptualise embodies the action of the metaphorical sentence.
Outcome: The proposed model enables interpretation of figurative language when the action of the metaphorical sentence is more embodied.
Perceptual Structure in the absence of grounding: the impact of abstractedness and subjectivity in color language for LLMs (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that color perception and color language are suitable for empirically studying the problem.
Approach: They propose to quantify alignment between a defined color space and a feature space in a language model by learning a mapping between embedding space and color space.
Outcome: The results show that there is considerable alignment between a defined color space and the feature space defined by a language model.
Concreteness vs. Abstractness: A Selectional Preference Perspective (2022.aacl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using a collection of 5,438 nouns and 1,275 verbs, we exploit selectional preferences as a salient characteristic in classifying abstract vs. concrete words.
Approach: They propose to use selectional preferences as a criterion to distinguish between concrete and abstract concepts and words.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves an f1-score of 0.84 for nouns and 0.71 for verbs in classification and Spearman’s correlation of 0.86 for nonoms and 0.59% for verb.
Is a cute puyfred cute? Context-dependent form-meaning systematicity in LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: valence is encoded in meaningful ways in large language models and in some LLMs, pseudowords affect the representation of whole sentences similarly to words.
Approach: They investigate how LLMs represent valence, a key semantic attribute, and how they deal with contextualisation of pseudowords in sentences.
Outcome: The results show that the models represent valence, a key semantic attribute, in sentences and in context, and that they handle the contextualisation of pseudowords differently.
Metaphor and Large Language Models: When Surface Features Matter More than Deep Understanding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on metaphor processing have focused on single datasets and specific task settings, often using artificially constructed data through lexical replacement.
Approach: They propose to evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in metaphor interpretation across multiple datasets, tasks, and prompt configurations.
Outcome: The proposed frameworks are more realistic and efficient than current models and are more efficient than existing models.
LLM-based Literal Example Generation for Japanese Multiword Expressions (2026.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on Japanese multiword expressions has focused on detecting idiomatic usages in context, leaving literal readings underrepresented.
Approach: They propose to use corpus non-literal usages as contrastive cues for controlled prompting . they compare their results to a test that compares model predictions with human judgments .
Outcome: The proposed model provides more accurate literal examples than prompts that include no hints or literal information.
Quantifying the Visual Concreteness of Words and Topics in Multimodal Datasets (N18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work suggests that concepts with concrete visual manifestations are easier to learn than abstract ones.
Approach: They propose an algorithm for automatically computing the visual concreteness of words and topics within multimodal datasets.
Outcome: The proposed algorithm predicts the capacity of machine learning algorithms to learn textual/visual relationships.
Do LLMs Adhere to Label Definitions? Examining Their Receptivity to External Label Definitions (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Exact label definitions are considered as clues to disambiguate unclear labels, helping models perform their tasks more effectively.
Approach: They conducted controlled experiments on multiple explanation benchmark datasets and label definition conditions using expert-curated, LLM-generated, perturbed, and swapped definitions.
Outcome: The results suggest that models often default to internal representations, particularly in general tasks, while domain-specific tasks benefit more from explicit definitions.
The Interplay between Metaphors and NLP (2026.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial will provide an overview of the metaphor processing field.
Approach: This tutorial will provide an overview of the metaphor processing field . it will focus on recent directions opened by LLMs for metaphor interpretation .
Outcome: The tutorial will discuss the influence of various metaphor theories on the creation of annotated resources and models.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations