XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Nuo Chen, Andre Lin HuiKai, Jiaying Wu, Junyi Hou, Zining Zhang, Qian Wang, Xidong Wang, Bingsheng He
| Challenge: | Existing systems are designed for general-purpose scientific text generation and fail to support high-quality scientific writing beyond surface-level polishing. |
| Approach: | They propose a human-AI collaboration framework for academic paper revision based on criteria-guided intent alignment and context-aware modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing LLMs and rivals the quality of proprietary ones. |
Similar Papers
Can AI Revise Research Papers with Human Review Feedback? An Empirical Study and Benchmark (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are fundamentally reshaping the scientific landscape, transitioning the role of AI from passive tools to active partners within a new paradigm of Human-AI collaboration. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to improve papers with human feedback. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark tests the skills of Large Language Models (LLMs) on paper interpretation, experimental implementation, and paper formulation, using authors’ camera-ready versions as natural human baselines. |
Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revision (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a framework for collaborative document revision is lacking for empirical analysis and NLP. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for joint analysis of collaborative document revision that instantiates a corpus of aligned scientific paper revisions manually labeled according to their action and intent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides first empirical insights into collaborative document revision in the academic domain and assesses its capabilities. |
arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writing (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new computational framework is developed to study text revision in scientific writing . authors propose a method to extract revision at document-, sentence-, and word-levels . |
| Approach: | They propose a computational framework for studying text revision in scientific writing . arXivEdits is an annotated corpus of 751 full papers from arX . authors propose to use sentence alignment, fine-grained edits and intents to extract revision . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to study revision in scientific writing. |
Towards a Human-Computer Collaborative Scientific Paper Lifecycle: A Pilot Study and Hands-On Tutorial (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial aims to provide an overview of the scientific paper lifecycle . large language models (LLMs) have increasingly played an important role in academic writing . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide an overview of the scientific paper lifecycle using large language models. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial will provide an overview of the scientific paper lifecycle, including scientific literature understanding, experiment development, manuscript draft writing, and finally draft evaluation. |
ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new system that leverages the encyclopedic knowledge and linguistic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is proposed to enhance the productivity of researchers . a researcher's research idea generation process involves problem identification, method development, experiment design and iterative revision . |
| Approach: | They propose a system that leverages encyclopedic knowledge and linguistic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models to assist researchers in their work. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system generates novel ideas based on human and model-based evaluations . it leverages encyclopedic knowledge and linguistic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models based systems . |
PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers in Overleaf (2026.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Jiarui Liu, Terry Jingchen Zhang, Ryan Faulkner, Xuanqiang Angelo Huang, Vilém Zouhar, Dominik Glandorf, Isabel Dahlgren, Rishit Dagli, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Van Q. Truong, Punya Syon Pandey, Yves Bicker, Suvajit Majumder, Wenyuan Jiang, Zeju Qiu, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Mrinmaya Sachan, Bernhard Schölkopf, Mona T. Diab, Zhijing Jin
| Challenge: | Emerging AI-powered writing assistants focus on grammar fixes or simulating peer review with final scores, yet they fall short of providing concrete, actionable suggestions that help students improve their papers during drafting. |
| Approach: | They propose a human-centered writing assistant system that delivers actionable suggestions as Overleaf-native inline comments while leaving the actual writing entirely to human authors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms a baseline with the skill library and provides actionable suggestions while leaving the actual writing to human authors. |
PaperRobot: Incremental Draft Generation of Scientific Ideas (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a paper robot can read existing papers and create new nodes or links in the knowledge graphs. |
| Approach: | They propose to automate the creation of new ideas by predicting links from the background KGs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed paper automates three tasks: read existing papers, create new ideas, predict links . the paper generated abstracts, conclusion and future work sections, and new titles are chosen over human-written ones up to 30%, 24% and 12% of the time. |
Automatic and Human-AI Interactive Text Generation (with a focus on Text Simplification and Revision) (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we focus on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks, that takes a piece of text as input and then generates a revision that is improved according to some specific criteria. |
| Approach: | This tutorial focuses on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks that takes a piece of text as input and generates a revision that is improved according to some specific criteria. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial focuses on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks, that takes a piece of text as input and generates a revision that is improved according to some specificcriteria. |
SciXGen: A Scientific Paper Dataset for Context-Aware Text Generation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generating texts in scientific papers requires not only capturing the content contained within the given input but also frequently acquiring the external information called context. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of context-aware text generation in the scientific domain to exploit the contributions of context in generated texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset comprehensively benchmarks the efficacy of the proposed dataset in generating description and paragraph. |
Intention-Adaptive LLM Fine-Tuning for Text Revision Generation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated impressive capabilities in context-based text generation tasks, such as summarization and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose an intention-adaptive layer-wise LLM fine-tuning framework that dynamically selects a subset of LLM layers to learn intentions and transfers them to revision generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms PEFT baselines on small revision corpora while maintaining fast convergence and accuracy. |