IGenBench: Benchmarking the Reliability of Text-to-Infographic Generation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yinghao Tang, Xueding Liu, Boyuan Zhang, Tingfeng Lan, Yupeng Xie, Jiale Lao, Yiyao Wang, Haoxuan Li, Tingting Gao, Bo Pan, Luoxuan Weng, Xiuqi Huang, Minfeng Zhu, Yingchaojie Feng, Yuyu Luo, Wei Chen
| Challenge: | Generated infographics may appear correct at first glance but contain easily overlooked issues, such as distorted data encoding or incorrect textual content. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate reliability of text-to-infographic generation using IGenBench . they employ multimodal large language models to verify each question . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework decomposes reliability verification into atomic yes/no questions based on a taxonomy of 10 question types. |
Similar Papers
T2I-ReasonBench: Benchmarking Reasoning-Informed Text-to-Image Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text-to-image (T2I) generative models have demonstrated exceptional capability in synthesizing high-quality images from textual prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to explore the knowledge-driven reasoning capabilities of T2I models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines the knowledge-driven reasoning capabilities of T2I models. |
R2I-Bench: Benchmarking Reasoning-Driven Text-to-Image Generation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning is a fundamental capability underpinning text-to-image (T2I) generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to rigorously assess reasoning-driven T2I generation. |
| Outcome: | Experiments with 16 representative T2I models show limited reasoning performance . a strong pipeline-based framework decouples reasoning and generation . |
Infogen: Generating Complex Statistical Infographics from Documents (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to generate simple charts have focused on generating simple infographics from text-heavy documents. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate statistical infographics composed of multiple sub-charts that are contextually accurate, insightful, and visually aligned. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms both open-source and closed LLMs in text-to-statistical infographic generation. |
T2I-FactualBench: Benchmarking the Factuality of Text-to-Image Models with Knowledge-Intensive Concepts (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ziwei Huang, Wanggui He, Quanyu Long, Yandi Wang, Haoyuan Li, Zhelun Yu, Fangxun Shu, Weilong Dai, Hao Jiang, Fei Wu, Leilei Gan
| Challenge: | Existing studies on text-to-image (T2I) models focus on text alignment, image quality, and object composition capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a T2I-FactualBench benchmark to evaluate the factuality of knowledge-intensive concept generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the factuality of knowledge-intensive concept generation tasks. |
Holistic Evaluation for Interleaved Text-and-Image Generation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks do not support arbitrarily interleaved images and text for both inputs and outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a benchmark to evaluate interleaved text-and-image generation . they define five evaluation aspects for InterleavatedEval, a reference-free metric . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks cover a limited number of domains and use cases and lack comparableity-based metrics. |
Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarization (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shankar Kantharaj, Rixie Tiffany Leong, Xiang Lin, Ahmed Masry, Megh Thakkar, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty
| Challenge: | Inferring key insights from charts can be challenging and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a task where the goal is to explain a chart and summarize key takeaways from it in natural language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces fluent summaries but suffers from hallucinations and factual errors . the proposed model is compared with other models and can be used to generate BLEU scores . |
AttributionBench: How Hard is Automatic Attribution Evaluation? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | generative search engines enhance the reliability of large language model responses by providing cited evidence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a benchmark to evaluate whether a large language model supports the generated responses or not . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that even a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 only achieves around 80% macro-F1 under a binary classification formulation. |
TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in generative language models have enabled machines to generate realistic texts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark environment to test the 'Turing Test' problem for neural text generation methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark environment is based on 200K human- or machine-generated samples across 20 labels Human, GPT-1, GTP-2_small, GTT-2_medium, GPG-2_large, GGT-2_PyTorch, GGP-3, GROVER_base, griover_large and GRover_mega. |
Can We Trust the Performance Evaluation of Uncertainty Estimation Methods in Text Summarization? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text summarization is a key natural language generation task, but the high cost of inaccurate summaries raises concerns about the reliability of uncertainty estimation on text summarisation (UE-TS) evaluation methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a UE-TS benchmark that evaluates the uncertainty estimation capabilities of two large language models and one pre-trained language model on three datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the uncertainty estimation capabilities of two large language models and one pre-trained language model on three datasets, with human-annotation analysis incorporated where applicable. |
AssertionBench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Large-Language Models for Assertion Generation (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Assertions have been the de facto collateral for hardware for over a decade. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ effectiveness for assertion generation quantitatively. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares state-of-the-art LLMs with existing benchmarks and shows that they generate higher fractions of functionally correct assertions. |