Investigating Critical Period Effects in Language Acquisition through Neural Language Models (2025.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Scholars of human development have long debated whether these phenomena are predetermined by innately encoded developmental changes in the maturing brain or natural consequences of increased experience. |
| Approach: | They use language models to test whether CP effects are peculiar to humans . they find that LMs do not show CP when L2 exposure is delayed . scholars have long debated whether innate maturation changes predetermine CP . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model does not show CP effects when the age of exposure of L2 is delayed. |
Similar Papers
Developmentally-plausible Working Memory Shapes a Critical Period for Language Acquisition (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models possess general linguistic abilities comparable to humans but their efficiency in language acquisition remains far inferior. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that initially constrains working memory during the early stages of training and gradually relaxes this constraint as learning progresses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms conventional methods without memory constraints or with static memory constraints. |
Second Language Acquisition of Neural Language Models (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examined the cross-lingual transferability of neural language models . previous studies focused on their first language acquisition . |
| Approach: | They propose to pretrain bilingual LMs with a scenario similar to human L2 acquisition . they find that pretraining accelerated their linguistic generalization in L2 . |
| Outcome: | The results show that pretraining bilingual LMs accelerates their linguistic generalizations . the results clarify their (non-)human-like L2 acquisition in particular aspects . |
Context Limitations Make Neural Language Models More Human-Like (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models (LMs) have been used in cognitive modeling and engineering studies to simulate human cognitive load during reading. |
| Approach: | They propose to constrain LMs' context access to improve their simulation of human reading behavior by incorporating syntactic biases into their context access. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the simulation of human reading behavior by incorporating syntactic biases into their context access. |
Word Acquisition in Neural Language Models (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models acquire individual words during training, based on unigram token frequencies, before transitioning loosely to bigram probabilities, eventually converging on more nuanced predictions. |
| Approach: | They examine how neural language models acquire individual words during training, extracting learning curves and ages of acquisition for over 600 words on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory. |
| Outcome: | The models follow consistent patterns during training for both unidirectional and bidirectional models, and for both LSTM and Transformer architectures. |
Adaptation Odyssey in LLMs: Why Does Additional Pretraining Sometimes Fail to Improve? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In the last decade, the generalization and adaptation abilities of deep learning models were evaluated on fixed training and test distributions. |
| Approach: | They propose to train large language models on unlabeled text corpora and train them online. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model training on a text domain could degrade its perplexity on the test portion of the same domain. |
Language Models Grow Less Humanlike beyond Phase Transition (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that LMs' alignment with human reading behavior improves during pretraining up to a tipping point, beyond which it plateaus or degrades. |
| Approach: | They hypothesize that a pretraining phase transition is responsible for the tipping point in PPP and that phase transitions alter the subsequent learning dynamics of the model, such that further training keeps damaging PPP. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to produce attention patterns that contribute to the degradation of PPP, but it is not capable of producing attention patterns. |
The Grammar-Learning Trajectories of Neural Language Models (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we show that neural language models with different initialization, architecture, and training data acquire linguistic phenomena in a similar order, despite their different end performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use mutual inductive bias to study linguistic representations implicit in NLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach shows that NLMs with different initialization, architecture, and training data acquire linguistic phenomena in a similar order, despite their different end performance. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Does Vision Accelerate Hierarchical Generalization in Neural Language Learners? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural language models (LMs) are arguably less data-efficient than humans from a language acquisition perspective. |
| Approach: | They investigate the advantage of grounded language acquisition over visual input to improve syntactic generalization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is less efficient than humans in language acquisition . it shows that visual input helps syntactic generalization, but not vision . |
Speech language models lack important brain-relevant semantics (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that text-based language models predict both text- and speech-evoked brain activity. |
| Approach: | They remove low-level stimulus features from language models to assess their impact on alignment with fMRI brain recordings during reading and listening. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model removes low-level features from fMRI brain recordings to assess their impact on alignment with fmr recordings. |