Challenge: Recent studies have focused on the False Consensus Effect (FCE) where individuals overestimate the extent to which others share their beliefs or behaviors.
Approach: They conduct two studies to examine the FCE phenomenon in Large Language Models (LLMs) they find that popular LLMs have FCE and that they have different prompting styles.
Outcome: The proposed model is popular among LLM users and specifies the conditions when FCE becomes more or less prevalent compared to normal usage.

Similar Papers

Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that biased LLMs can influence decisions in areas such as medical classifications and educational hiring.
Approach: They conducted two interactive experiments on partisan bias in large language models while completing tasks with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model.
Outcome: The results show that prior knowledge of AI is weakly correlated with a reduction of the bias, suggesting that AI education can be crucial for mitigating bias effects.
Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness – Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for accessing information on the web.
Approach: They conduct experiments with 80 crowdworkers to compare LLMs with search engines . they ask LLM to provide contrastive information to reduce over-reliance on LLM .
Outcome: The results show that LLMs can outperform search engines but not LLM explanations . the study shows that LMS explanations are not reliable replacements for reading retrieved passages compared to search engines alone.
Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models exhibit undesirable preference toward predicting certain answers over others, despite their adaptability to diverse tasks.
Approach: They propose a label bias calibration method that outperforms recent calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Conformity in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Conformity is a form of social influence that affects the way people respond to information.
Approach: They adapt psychological experiments to examine the extent of conformity in large language models.
Outcome: The proposed interventions mitigate conformity by reducing the naturalness of majority tones and reducing instruction-tuned models.
Human Alignment: How Much Do We Adapt to LLMs? (2025.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a common part of our lives, yet few studies have examined how they influence our behavior.
Approach: They propose a cooperative language game in which players aim to converge on a word and play a game in a group.
Outcome: The proposed game shows that humans notice and adapt to differences regardless of whether they are aware they are interacting with an LLM.
How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Cognitive biases can be observed in LLMs, affecting their reliability in real-world applications.
Approach: They investigate the anchoring effect in LLM-driven price negotiations . reasoning models are less prone to the anchor effect, they find .
Outcome: The proposed study shows that LLMs are influenced by the anchoring effect like humans . reasoning models are less prone to the anchor effect, but personality traits are not affected .
Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendations (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized product recommenders, but their susceptibility to adversarial manipulations is difficult to detect.
Approach: They propose to use large language models to investigate cognitive biases as adversarial strategies in product research using LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed approach is the first to tap into human psychological principles, making such manipulations hard to detect.
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies.
Approach: They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
Outcome: The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
Do LLMs Align Human Values Regarding Social Biases? Judging and Explaining Social Biases with LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models can lead to undesired consequences when misaligned with human values . previous studies have shown misalignment of LLMs with human value using expert-designed or agent-based emulated bias scenarios .
Approach: They investigate whether large language models (LLMs) are misaligned with human values . they find no significant differences in understanding of HVSB between LLMs .
Outcome: The results show that large language models do not have lower misalignment rates and attack success rates . the study also shows that smaller language models have the ability to explain HVSB .
Factuality of Large Language Models: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are factually incorrect, which limits their applicability in real-world scenarios.
Approach: They analyze existing work to identify major challenges and their associated causes . they propose to evaluate LLMs using a variety of measures to mitigate factual errors .
Outcome: The proposed methods are based on a variety of datasets and proposed strategies to mitigate factual errors.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations