Efficient Annotator Reliability Assessment and Sample Weighting for Knowledge-Based Misinformation Detection on Social Media (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Owen Cook, Charlie Grimshaw, Ben Peng Wu, Sophie Dillon, Jack Hicks, Luke Jones, Thomas Smith, Matyas Szert, Xingyi Song
| Challenge: | Misinformation spreads rapidly on social media, confusing the truth and targeting potentially vulnerable people. |
| Approach: | They propose to use inter- and intra-annotator agreement to understand the reliability of each annotator and influence the training of large language models based on annotators reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework utilises inter- and intra-annotator agreement to understand the reliability of each annotator and influence the training of large language models based on annotators reliability. |
Similar Papers
Efficient Annotator Reliability Assessment with EffiARA (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Obtaining annotations from experts is ideal, but this expertise is logistically and financially costly. |
| Approach: | They propose an annotation framework that supports the whole annotation pipeline from understanding the resources required for an annotation task to compiling the annotated dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves classification performance through annotator-reliability-based soft-label aggregation and sample weighting, and increases agreement among annotators through removal of identifying and replacing an unreliable annotation. |
FALTE: A Toolkit for Fine-grained Annotation for Long Text Evaluation (2022.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tools to evaluate long text outputs are lacking in the field of NLP . human rating and error analysis remains a crucial component for any evaluation of long text generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a web-based toolkit to collect fine-grained error annotations for long texts . they use a taxonomy to identify errors and assign them to text spans . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can be used to evaluate the coherence of long generated summaries. |
The Promises and Pitfalls of LLM Annotations in Dataset Labeling: a Case Study on Media Bias Detection (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Tomáš Horych, Christoph Mandl, Terry Ruas, Andre Greiner-Petter, Bela Gipp, Akiko Aizawa, Timo Spinde
| Challenge: | Recent research suggests using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the annotation process, reducing these costs while maintaining data quality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models to automate annotation process and train classifiers on large datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all of the annotator LLMs on two media bias benchmark datasets (BABE and BASIL) while maintaining data quality. |
MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of “Alternative Facts” (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to address misinformation on social media platforms are hampered by user biases and scalability challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating and comprehensively evaluating large language model based misinformation interventions using a simulated social media environment and personalized explanations tailored to users' beliefs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy at reliability labeling by up to 41.72% and personalized explanations appeal to users' pre-existing values. |
AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | generative AI is a counter-measure to misinformation, but factual claim detection suffers from inconsistency in definitions and high cost of manual annotation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that assists in the annotation of factual claims with the help of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to annotate factual claims with the help of large language models and can work with or without expert supervision. |
Learning from Measurements in Crowdsourcing Models: Inferring Ground Truth from Diverse Annotation Types (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Annotated corpora are often assigned to internet workers whose judgments are reconciled by crowdsourcing models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for learning from rich prior knowledge to combine annotations with different structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model compares favorably with previous work and enables active sample selection to reduce annotation effort. |
Attacking Misinformation Detection Using Adversarial Examples Generated by Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can be used to attack content filtering algorithms in social media platforms. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate adversarial examples to test the robustness of social media content filtering algorithms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models in the case of propaganda, false claims, rumours and hyperpartisan news. |
A Thesis Proposal ClaimInspector Framework: A Hybrid Approach to Data Annotation using Fact-Checked Claims and LLMs (2024.eacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current efforts focus on textual claims sourced mainly from Twitter . lack of automated control measures and reliance on human annotation increase noise risk . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a framework to integrate data annotation to mitigate misinformation . they propose to include fact-checks alongside the corresponding claims made by politicians . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset will include fact-checks alongside the corresponding claims made by politicians. |
SCORE: Systematic COnsistency and Robustness Evaluation for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Typical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) report a single accuracy metric per dataset, often derived from an optimized setup. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for non-adversarial evaluation of large language models that evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups to give a realistic estimate of their accuracy and consistency. |
Holistic Inter-Annotator Agreement and Corpus Coherence Estimation in a Large-scale Multilingual Annotation Campaign (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper we examine the complexity of persuasion technique annotation in a multilingual annotation campaign involving 6 languages and approximately 40 annotators. |
| Approach: | They propose a word embedding-based annotator agreement metric and propose 'holistic IAA' metric to measure the coherence of the entire dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is compared with the existing IAA metrics and its correlation with the results. |