VANE-Bench: Video Anomaly Evaluation Benchmark for Conversational LMMs (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly influenced the development of Large Multi-modal Video Models. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess the proficiency of Large Multi-modal Video Models (LMMs) in detecting and localizing anomalies and inconsistencies in videos. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses the proficiency of Video-LMMs in detecting and localizing anomalies and inconsistencies in videos. |
Similar Papers
VALU: A Benchmark for Video Anomaly Temporal Localization and Understanding at Multiple Semantic Levels (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yixiao He, Menghao Zhang, Haifeng Sun, Jing Wang, Kangheng Lin, Jinghan Wang, Chenye Xu, Pengfei Ren, Qi Qi, Jingyu Wang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) enhance the ability of VAU models to describe and interpret anomalies. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that explicitly defines anomalies across five semantic levels and provides detailed temporal boundaries and detailed textual descriptions for each. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark defines anomalies across five semantic levels and provides detailed descriptions for each. |
MVTamperBench: Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Amit Agarwal, Srikant Panda, Angeline Charles, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Bhargava Kumar, Priyaranjan Pattnayak, Taki Hasan Rafi, Tejaswini Kumar, Hansa Meghwani, Karan Gupta, Dong-Kyu Chae
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been a key advance in video understanding but their vulnerability to adversarial tampering remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They evaluate MLLMs against five prevalent tampering techniques to assess their robustness . they use a tampered video format to examine the vulnerability of ML models . |
| Outcome: | The benchmark evaluates MLLMs against five prevalent tampering techniques based on 19 video manipulation tasks. |
AD-LLM: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Anomaly Detection (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tiankai Yang, Yi Nian, Li Li, Ruiyao Xu, Yuangang Li, Jiaqi Li, Zhuo Xiao, Xiyang Hu, Ryan A. Rossi, Kaize Ding, Xia Hu, Yue Zhao
| Challenge: | Anomaly detection (AD) is an important machine learning task with many real-world uses, including fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and industrial monitoring. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates how large language models (LLMs) can help with NLP anomaly detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform zero-shot detection without tasks-specific training, data augmentation and model selection, and it can suggest unsupervised AD models. |
A Culturally-diverse Multilingual Multimodal Video Benchmark & Model (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Bhuiyan Sanjid Shafique, Ashmal Vayani, Muhammad Maaz, Hanoona Abdul Rasheed, Dinura Dissanayake, Mohammed Irfan Kurpath, Yahya Hmaiti, Go Inoue, Jean Lahoud, Md. Safirur Rashid, Shadid Intisar Quasem, Maheen Fatima, Franco Vidal, Mykola Maslych, Ketan Pravin More, Sanoojan Baliah, Hasindri Watawana, Yuhao Li, Fabian Farestam, Leon Schaller, Roman Tymtsiv, Simon Weber, Hisham Cholakkal, Ivan Laptev, Shin’ichi Satoh, Michael Felsberg, Mubarak Shah, Salman Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan
| Challenge: | Large multimodal models have gained attention for their effectiveness to understand and generate descriptions of visual content. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual Video LMM benchmark to evaluate video LMMs across 14 languages . they also introduce a machine translated multilingual video training set . |
| Outcome: | The proposed video LMM benchmark is designed to evaluate video Lmms across 14 languages including Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, English, French, German, Hindi, Japanese, Russian, Sinhala, Spanish, Swedish, Tamil, and Urdu. |
NLP-ADBench: NLP Anomaly Detection Benchmark (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Anomaly detection (AD) is an important machine learning task, but its effectiveness in detecting harmful content, phishing attempts, and spam reviews is limited. |
| Approach: | They introduce NLP-ADBench, the most comprehensive NLP anomaly detection benchmark to date . it includes eight curated datasets and 19 state-of-the-art algorithms . |
| Outcome: | The NLP-ADBench benchmark includes 19 state-of-the-art methods and 8 curated datasets . no single model dominates across all datasets, indicating need for automated model selection . |
VideoPASTA: 7K Preference Pairs That Matter for Video-LLM Alignment (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Video-language models excel at understanding video content but struggle with spatial relationships, temporal ordering, and cross-frame continuity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that trains video-LLMs to distinguish accurate representations from carefully crafted adversarial examples. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that VideoPASTA improves performance without human annotation or captioning . the framework can be used on various state-of-the-art video-LLMs with no human annotation . |
TC-Bench: Benchmarking Temporal Compositionality in Conditional Video Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing video generation models struggle to interpret compositional changes and synthesize components across different time steps. |
| Approach: | They propose a temporal compositionality benchmark that uses text prompts and ground truth videos to evaluate compositional changes in video. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark can be used for text-to-video and image-to video generation. |
INFACT: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Induced Faithfulness and Factuality Hallucinations in Video-LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks only evaluate models in clean settings due to hallucinations . |
| Approach: | They propose a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates models in four modes for faithfulness and factuality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates models in four modes: Base (clean), Visual Degradation, Evidence Corruption, and Temporal Intervention for order-sensitive items. |
CAMEL-Bench: A Comprehensive Arabic LMM Benchmark (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Sara Ghaboura, Ahmed Heakl, Omkar Thawakar, Ali Husain Salem Abdulla Alharthi, Ines Riahi, Abduljalil Radman, Jorma Laaksonen, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan, Rao Muhammad Anwer
| Challenge: | Recent years have witnessed a significant interest in developing large multimodal models capable of performing various visual reasoning and understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Arabic as a language to evaluate large multi-modal models capable of performing visual reasoning and understanding tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. |
MT-Video-Bench: A Holistic Video Understanding Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yaning Pan, Qianqian Xie, Guohui Zhang, Zekun Moore Wang, Yongqian Wen, Yuanxing Zhang, Haoxuan Hu, Zhiyu Pan, Yibing Huang, Zhidong Gan, Yonghong Lin, An Ping, Shihao Li, Yanghai Wang, Tianhao Peng, Jiaheng Liu
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation benchmarks for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) focus on single-turn question answering, overlooking the complexity of multi-turn dialogues in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a video understanding benchmark for MLLMs in multi-turn dialogues that assesses six core competencies that focus on perceptivity and interactivity. |
| Outcome: | The MT-Video-Bench evaluates 1,000 multi-turn dialogues from diverse domains and reveals significant performance discrepancies and limitations in handling multi-turned video dialogues. |