SciAssess: Benchmarking LLM Proficiency in Scientific Literature Analysis (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Hengxing Cai, Xiaochen Cai, Junhan Chang, Sihang Li, Lin Yao, Wang Changxin, Zhifeng Gao, Hongshuai Wang, Li Yongge, Mujie Lin, Shuwen Yang, Jiankun Wang, Mingjun Xu, Jin Huang, Xi Fang, Jiaxi Zhuang, Yuqi Yin, Yaqi Li, Changhong Chen, Zheng Cheng, Zifeng Zhao, Linfeng Zhang, Guolin Ke
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks fail to adequately evaluate the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) Existing standards do not cover the skills needed to evaluate LLMs in scientific literature analysis. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the proficiency of large language models in scientific literature analysis. |
| Outcome: | SciAssess evaluates 11 LLMs on multiple tasks across scientific fields. |
Similar Papers
ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yujie Liu, Zonglin Yang, Tong Xie, Jinjie Ni, Ben Gao, Yuqiang Li, Shixiang Tang, Wanli Ouyang, Erik Cambria, Dongzhan Zhou
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined due to the lack of a dedicated benchmark. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating large language models on a sufficient set of scientific discovery sub-tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extracts critical components from papers across 12 disciplines with expert validation confirming its accuracy. |
SciEx: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Scientific Exams with Human Expert Grading and Automatic Grading (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Tu Dinh, Carlos Mullov, Leonard Bärmann, Zhaolin Li, Danni Liu, Simon Reiß, Jueun Lee, Nathan Lerzer, Jianfeng Gao, Fabian Peller-Konrad, Tobias Röddiger, Alexander Waibel, Tamim Asfour, Michael Beigl, Rainer Stiefelhagen, Carsten Dachsbacher, Klemens Böhm, Jan Niehues
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly developing and are becoming more and more useful in scientific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLM-as-a-judge to grade LLMs on SciEx to assess their ability on scientific tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the LLMs perform decently on free-form exams, achieving 0.948 Pearson correlation with expert grading. |
From Remembering to Metacognition: Do Existing Benchmarks Accurately Evaluate LLMs? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Geng Zhang, Yizhou Ying, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Guanglei Yue, Yifei Fu, Hailin Hu, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark datasets focus on low-level cognitive tasks while providing limited coverage of higher-level reasoning skills. |
| Approach: | They analyze the cognitive depth of popular LLM benchmarks using Bloom’s Taxonomy to evaluate both the cognitive and knowledge dimensions. |
| Outcome: | The results show that incorporating higher-level cognitive instructions into the current instruction fine-tuning process improves model performance. |
SciText2Eq: Assessing LLMs for Explainable Equation Generation for Scientific Creativity (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has addressed problems in unstructured grounding, multi-equation dependency, and human-aligned evaluation. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset of scientific texts and evaluate it using an explainable equation generation workflow using automatic metrics and human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves moderate performance on lexical and syntactic similarity, but struggles with semantic accuracy. |
Beyond Facts- Benchmarking Distributional Reading Comprehension in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pei-Fu Guo, Ya An Tsai, Chun-Chia Hsu, Kai-Xin Chen, Yun-Da Tsai, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng, Mi-Yen Yeh, Shou-De Lin
| Challenge: | Existing reading comprehension benchmarks focus on factual information, but many real-world tasks require distributional knowledge expressed across text. |
| Approach: | They propose a reading comprehension benchmark for LLMs to evaluate their ability to infer distributional knowledge from natural language. |
| Outcome: | Experiments with multiple LLMs show that the model outperforms baselines, but performance varies widely across distribution types and characteristics. |
Unequal Scientific Recognition in the Age of LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study evaluates the extent to which popular and frontier LLMs recognize scientists . recognition of scientists remains uneven across gender and geography . |
| Approach: | They evaluate the extent to which popular and frontier LLMs recognize scientists . they compare their outputs against OpenAlex and Wikipedia . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that they exhibit selective and inconsistent recognition patterns . women researchers and researchers from Africa, Asia, and Latin America are significantly underrecognized . |
A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing surveys on scientific LLMs focus on one or two fields or a single modality. |
| Approach: | They survey 260 scientific LLMs and examine their architectures and pre-training techniques . they also discuss commonalities and differences between LLM architectures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model architectures and evaluation techniques are used to improve scientific discovery. |
MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongwei Liu, Zilong Zheng, Yuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Zhiwei Fei, Fengzhe Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have showcased significant improvements in mathematics, but traditional benchmarks like GSM8k offer a unidimensional perspective. |
| Approach: | MathBench is a benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. |
| Outcome: | MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills. |
SciCustom: A Framework for Custom Evaluation of Scientific Capabilities in Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yiyang Gu, Junwei Yang, Junyu Luo, Ye Yuan, Bin Feng, Yingce Xia, Shufang Xie, Kaili Liu, Bohan Wu, Qi Shi, Haoran Li, Beier Xiao, Zhiping Xiao, Xiao Luo, Weizhi Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Zequn Liu, Ming Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of large language models fail to reflect fine-grained capabilities . existing benchmarks are manually curated or domain-generic, limiting scalability and alignment with real use cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that allows custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific scientific capabilities in LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reveals fine-grained differences in scientific capabilities that standard benchmarks overlook . it allows custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific capabilities in LLMs. |
MetaBench: A Multi-task Benchmark for Assessing LLMs in Metabolomics (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxing Lu, Xukai Zhao, J. Ben Tamo, Micky C. Nnamdi, Rui Peng, Shuang Zeng, Xingyu Hu, Jinzhuo Wang, May Dongmei Wang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on general text, but their proficiency in specialized scientific domains remains uncharacterized. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the capabilities of large language models in metabolomics research using MetaBench . they found that models perform well on text generation tasks, but cross-database identifier grounding remains challenging . |
| Outcome: | The evaluation of 25 open- and closed-source LLMs reveals distinct performance patterns across metabolomics tasks. |