Bridging the Creativity Understanding Gap: Small-Scale Human Alignment Enables Expert-Level Humor Ranking in LLMs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Kuan Lok Zhou, Jiayi Chen, Siddharth Suresh, Reuben Narad, Timothy T. Rogers, Lalit K Jain, Robert D Nowak, Bob Mankoff, Jifan Zhang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant limitations in understanding creative content, as demonstrated by Hessel et al. (2023)’s influential work on the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest. |
| Approach: | They propose to decompose humor understanding into three components and improve each by enhancing visual understanding through improved annotation and utilizing LLM-generated humor reasoning and explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves 82.4% accuracy in caption ranking, significantly better than the previous 67% benchmark and matches the performance of world-renowned human experts in this domain. |
Similar Papers
Uncovering Factor-Level Preference to Improve Human-Model Alignment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit tendencies that diverge from human preferences, such as favoring certain writing styles or producing overly verbose outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to uncover and measure factor-level preference alignment of humans and large language models (LLMs) |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework uncovers and measures factor-level preference alignment of humans and large language models. |
Beyond Reproduction: A Paired-Task Framework for Assessing LLM Comprehension and Creativity in Literary Translation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative tasks such as literary translation. |
| Approach: | They propose a paired-task framework that assesses translational creativity using Units of Creative Potential (UCPs) they benchmark 23 models and four creativity-oriented prompts to assess translational comprehension . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares 23 models and four creativity-oriented prompts on literary excerpts from 11 books. |
Creative Preference Optimization (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Mete Ismayilzada, Antonio Laverghetta Jr., Simone A. Luchini, Reet Patel, Antoine Bosselut, Lonneke Van Der Plas, Roger E. Beaty
| Challenge: | Existing methods for enhancing LLM creativity focus on diversity or specific tasks, failing to address creativity’s multifaceted nature in a generalizable way. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that injects signals from multiple creativity dimensions into the preference optimization objective in a modular fashion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baseline models on automated and human evaluations while maintaining high output quality. |
Beyond Divergent Creativity: A Human-Based Evaluation of Creativity in Large Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are increasingly used in verbal creative tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a divergent association task that focuses on novelty, ignoring appropriateness, a core component of creativity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model scores are lower than baselines with no creative abilities, undermining its validity for model evaluation. |
Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgments (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges to evaluate recommendation systems, search engines, and other subjective tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to align LLM judgments with individual human evaluators or their aggregated judgments without retraining or fine-tuning the LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 142% improvement in agreement across 29 tasks and exceeds inter-human agreement on four out of six tasks. |
Human Alignment: How Much Do We Adapt to LLMs? (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a common part of our lives, yet few studies have examined how they influence our behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a cooperative language game in which players aim to converge on a word and play a game in a group. |
| Outcome: | The proposed game shows that humans notice and adapt to differences regardless of whether they are aware they are interacting with an LLM. |
Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human and Large Language Model preferences are important for model fine-tuning and evaluation. |
| Approach: | They dissect the preferences of human and 32 different Large Language Models to understand their quantitative composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 32 different large language models using real-world user-model conversations. |
Deep Associations, High Creativity: A Simple yet Effective Metric for Evaluating Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies evaluate the creative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through diverse tasks, aiming to understand their strengths and limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to ask LLMs to generate Parallel Chains of Associations to Evaluate their creativity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework minimizes the risk of data contamination and offers a highly efficient evaluation. |
Exploring the Reliability of Large Language Models as Customized Evaluators for Diverse NLP Tasks (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work uses large language models (LLMs) to evaluate natural language process tasks, but there are shortcomings in current LLMs. |
| Approach: | They examine the alignment between LLM evaluators and human annotators by comparing conventional and alignment tasks with different evaluation criteria. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models excel in general criteria, such as fluency, but face challenges with complex criteria, including numerical reasoning. |
Aligning Language Models to User Opinions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Personality is a defining feature of human beings, shaped by a complex interplay of demographic characteristics, moral principles, and social experiences. |
| Approach: | They use public opinion surveys to model past user opinions in addition to user demographics and ideology to achieve up to 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from survey questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from public opinion surveys across a broad set of topics. |