How do Language Models Generate Slang: A Systematic Comparison between Human and Machine-Generated Slang Usages (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Slang is a commonly used type of informal language that poses a daunting challenge to NLP systems. |
| Approach: | They compare human-attested slang and swiss-generated slurs with machine-generated ones . they find that LLMs have significant knowledge about the creative aspects of sling . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model compares human and machine-generated slang usages to find biases in human perceptions of sling . the results suggest that human-attested slms have significant knowledge about the creative aspects of a language . |
Similar Papers
Toward Informal Language Processing: Knowledge of Slang in Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have offered a strong potential for natural language systems to process informal language. |
| Approach: | They propose to use movie subtitles to evaluate slang in large language models . they find that smaller LLMs finetuned on the dataset achieve comparable performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset can be used to evaluate LLMs on slang detection and identification of regional and historical sources for interpretive insights. |
Simple Models for Word Formation in Slang (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | slang is a popular vocabulary among young people due to its extragrammatical properties and the rise of social media. |
| Approach: | They propose a data-driven approach coupled with linguistic knowledge to develop generative models for three types of extra-grammatical word formation phenomena abounding in slang: Blends, Clippings, and Reduplicatives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that slang exhibits extragrammatical properties that distinguish it from the standard form. |
SLANG: New Concept Comprehension of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Dynamic nature of language limits the adaptability of Large Language Models (LLMs) Traditionally, LLMs are trained on static data, which limits their adaptability . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to integrate novel data and assess LLMs’ ability to comprehend emerging concepts, alongside a causal inference-based approach to enhance LLM comprehension of new phrases and their colloquial context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models in terms of precision and relevance in the comprehension of Internet slang and memes. |
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality traits, but there is limited research on whether they consistently reflect specific personality traits. |
| Approach: | They propose to study the behavior of LLM-based agents which they refer to as LLM personas and simulate them to measure their personality traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the Big Five personality model and has been validated by human evaluations and automatic evaluations. |
Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on using LLMs to classify text as either human-written or machine-generated . |
| Approach: | They characterize human-written and machine-generated texts using a set of linguistic features across different linguistic levels such as morphology, syntax, and semantics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reveals that human-written texts exhibit simpler syntactic structures and more diverse semantic content. |
Comparing the Evaluation and Production of Loophole Behavior in Humans and Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that loophole-seeking is frequent and intuitive in children . a large number of models capture the pragmatic understanding required for loopholes, says a researcher . |
| Approach: | a study compares large language models to humans to examine loophole behavior . they found that models struggle to recognize humor in creative exploitation of loopholes . |
| Outcome: | a study compares state-of-the-art models to humans to examine loophole behavior in humans . a large language model can generate loopholes, but only two are capable of generating them . |
Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models’ Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Language (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on specific domains or types of persuasion, but a general study has focused on how LLMs produce persuasive text. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset to measure and benchmark the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce persuasive text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to generate persuasive text across domains and domains. |
Comparing Apples to Oranges: A Dataset & Analysis of LLM Humour Understanding from Traditional Puns to Topical Jokes (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on humour explanation has focused on short pun-based jokes, but Large Language Models (LLMs) are not capable of generating adequate explanations of all joke types. |
| Approach: | They compare the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to explain humour from simple puns to complex topical humor that requires esoteric knowledge of real-world entities and events. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are incapable of generating adequate explanations of all joke types, highlighting the narrow focus of most existing work on overly simple joke forms. |
Subjective Behaviors and Preferences in LLM: Language of Browsing (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sai Sundaresan, Harshita Chopra, Atanu R. Sinha, Koustava Goswami, Nagasai Saketh Naidu, Raghav Karan, N Anushka
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) fuel expectations that a single trained model can effectively align with preferences of myriad users for a given task within a domain. |
| Approach: | They introduce clusterwise LM training, HeTLM, appropriate for subjective behaviors . authors say small LM outperforms large pretrained LMs; heterogeneous cluster specific set of parameters outperformed single LM . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms large pretrained or finetuned models in the domain of subjective behavior and preferences. |
AI Argues Differently: Distinct Argumentative and Linguistic Patterns of LLMs in Persuasive Contexts (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distinguishing LLM-generated text from human-written is a key challenge for safe and ethical NLP, especially in high-stake settings such as persuasive online discourse. |
| Approach: | They propose to use general-purpose linguistic features and domain-specific features related to argument quality to compare human- and LLM-authored arguments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares arguments by humans and three LLMs using two easily-interpretable feature sets. |