Challenge: a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art reranking methods is presented.
Approach: They evaluate 22 reranking methods including 40 variants across established benchmarks . primary goal is to determine whether performance disparity exists between LLM-based reranters and lightweight counterparts based on novel queries .
Outcome: The proposed methods perform better on familiar queries than lightweight models, the authors show .

Similar Papers

Efficiency-Effectiveness Reranking FLOPs for LLM-based Rerankers (2025.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies evaluate the efficiency of LLM-based rerankers using proxy metrics such as latency and the number of forward passes.
Approach: They propose to use a large language model to evaluate the efficiency of LLM-based rerankers . they propose to measure ranking quality and query processing efficiency using an interpretable FLOPs estimator .
Outcome: The proposed metrics evaluate LLM-based rerankers with different architectures without running any experiments.
Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) are more efficient in natural language understanding tasks.
Approach: They evaluate large language models (LLMs) using a TREC Fair Ranking dataset . they assess fairness from both user and content perspectives .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the existing models in the fair ranking task.
GroupRank: A Groupwise Paradigm for Effective and Efficient Passage Reranking with LLMs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing rankers excel in lexical-matching scenarios, while they struggle with complex queries requiring deep reasoning.
Approach: They propose a new paradigm that balances flexibility and context awareness to unlock the full potential of groupwise reranking.
Outcome: The proposed approach achieves a state-of-the-art 65.2 NDCG@10 on BRIGHT and surpasses baselines by 2.1 points on R2MED while delivering a 6.4 inference speedup.
Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages (2024.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive zero-shot capabilities in various passage ranking tasks.
Approach: They analyze and compare the effectiveness of monolingual reranking using query or document translations and evaluate the effectiveness when leveraging their own generated translations.
Outcome: The proposed models perform better when using their own translations than when using query or document translations.
Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples! (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models have made remarkable strides in various tasks, but whether they are competitive few-shot solvers remains an open question.
Approach: They propose an adaptive filter-then-rerank paradigm to combine the strengths of LLMs and SLMs.
Outcome: The proposed system achieves promising improvements on various IE tasks with acceptable time and cost investment.
Ranking Unraveled: Recipes for LLM Rankings in Head-to-Head AI Combat (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is a complex task. Pairwise ranking has emerged as state-of-the-art method to evaluate human preferences.
Approach: They propose to use pairwise ranking to evaluate human preferences . they propose to evaluate the robustness of ranking algorithms in LLMs .
Outcome: The proposed methods are based on the principles of effective ranking and the robustness of several ranking algorithms in the context of LLMs.
BracketRank: Large Language Model Document Ranking via Reasoning-based Competitive Elimination (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing lists of document ranking methods lack robust performance across domains.
Approach: They propose a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that optimises group sizes based on LLM context limits and reasoning-enhanced prompts.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods on datasets with a 77.90 NDCG@5 score and 54.66 average NDGC@10 on BEIR datasets.
Open-source Large Language Models are Strong Zero-shot Query Likelihood Models for Document Ranking (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that large language models (LLMs) rank documents based on the probability of generating the query given the content of a document.
Approach: They propose a ranking system that integrates LLMs with a hybrid zero-shot retriever.
Outcome: The proposed system shows exceptional ranking in both zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing listwise LLMs lack efficiency as they provide ranking output in the form of a generated ordered sequence of candidate passage identifiers.
Approach: They propose a listwise LLM reranking approach that leverages the first generated identifier to obtain a ranked ordering of the candidates.
Outcome: The proposed approach accelerates inference by 50% while maintaining robust ranking performance with gains across BEIR benchmark.
UDAPDR: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via LLM Prompting and Distillation of Rerankers (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for information retrieval tasks require large labeled datasets for fine-tuning, but they can experience significant drops in accuracy due to distribution shifts from the training to the target domain.
Approach: They propose a method for using large language models to generate large numbers of synthetic queries cheaply using an expensive LLM.
Outcome: The proposed method boosts zero-shot accuracy in long-tail domains and achieves substantially lower latency than standard reranking methods.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations