Thinking Before You Speak: A Proactive Test-time Scaling Approach (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models often exhibit deficiencies with complex reasoning tasks, such as maths, due to the discrepancy between human reasoning patterns and those presented in training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to insert insights between consecutive reasoning steps to bridge this gap by generating insights between the next reasoning steps. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on mathematical datasets confirm the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning framework on complex problems. |
Similar Papers
Think, Verbalize, then Speak: Bridging Complex Thoughts and Comprehensible Speech (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to decouple LLMs from spoken communication produce suboptimal results due to mismatches between optimal textual and verbal delivery. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that decouples reasoning from spoken delivery to preserve the full reasoning capacity of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework preserves full reasoning capacity of large language models . it improves speech naturalness and conciseness with minimal impact on reasoning . |
Think Before You Speak: Cultivating Communication Skills of Large Language Models via Inner Monologue (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | emergence of large language models (LLMs) improves capabilities of dialogue systems . but they lack communication skills, which make them more like information seeking tools . |
| Approach: | They propose to empower LLMs with communication skills through inner monologues . they use a benchmark to evaluate the dialogue generation ability of the model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the baselines in the evaluation of communication skills. |
Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scaling (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for teaching language models to be economical with their token budgets have failed to achieve the desired results. |
| Approach: | They propose to calibrate a language model's growing body of thoughts to determine when new reasoning plateaus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework preserves model performance with up to 60% reduction in thinking tokens on in-distribution data, and up to 20% in out-of-difference data. |
Think Before You Speak: Explicitly Generating Implicit Commonsense Knowledge for Response Generation (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Pei Zhou, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Seokhwan Kim, Jay Pujara, Xiang Ren, Yang Liu, Dilek Hakkani-Tur
| Challenge: | Current neural response generation models generate responses directly, omitting unstated implicit knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a generative approach to externalize implicit commonsense knowledge and use it to generate responses. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that TBS models outperform end-to-end RG models on most automatic metrics and generate more informative, specific, and commonsense-following responses. |
Beyond Examples: Towards Automated Thought-level In-Context Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jinyang Wu, Mingkuan Feng, Shuai Zhang, Feihu Che, Zhengqi Wen, Chonghua Liao, Ling Yang, Haoran Luo, Zheng Lian, Jianhua Tao
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) struggles with complex reasoning due to superficial, example-level implicit imitation. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated method that shifts from surface-level examples to more guidance-oriented thought patterns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 80.6% accuracy on MATH and 62.5% on AMC, surpassing GPT-4o’s 77.2% and 57.5% accuracy. |
Prejudge-Before-Think: Enhancing Large Language Models at Test-Time by Process Prejudge Reasoning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results from competition-level complex reasoning demonstrate that bootstrapping with process prejudge can significantly enhance the reasoning ability of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a new process prejudge strategy for LLM reasoning that bootstraps with process prejudgment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be bootstrapped with process prejudge in LLM reasoning . it allows the model to anticipate errors rather than relying on trial and error. |
ReEfBench: Quantifying the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for Chain-of-Thought evaluations do not distinguish between genuine reasoning and mere verbosity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for the non-intrusive, comprehensive process-centric evaluation of reasoning grounded in First-Order Logic. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework identifies four distinct behavioral prototypes and diagnoses the failure modes. |
Iteratively Prompt Pre-trained Language Models for Chain of Thought (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models (PLMs) internalize a great amount of knowledge, but have been shown incapable of recalling this knowledge to solve complex & multi-step reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose an iterative prompting framework which progressively elicits relevant knowledge from PLMs for multi-step inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed prompting framework outperforms existing prompting methods on three datasets involving multi-step reasoning. |
Chain of Methodologies: Scaling Test Time Computation without Training (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing prompts for complex reasoning tasks are limited to specific tasks with few-shot examples due to constraints like context length and information extraction accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to build structured reasoning processes by injecting human insights into LLMs' training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines in the analysis of large language models. |
Development of Cognitive Intelligence in Pre-trained Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show evidence for emergent cognitive abilities in Large Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs). Prior research into emergental cognitive abilities of PLMs has been path-independent to model training. |
| Approach: | They use four task categories to examine the alignment of ten popular families of PLMs and evaluate their performance to the developmental trajectories of children's thinking. |
| Outcome: | The results show that the models are more aligned to children's thinking than previous studies. |