Challenge: This survey analyses 198 studies published between January 2022 and March 2025 .
Approach: This survey synthesizes recent advances in CV corpus creation and system design.
Outcome: The results of this study are synthesized from 198 studies published between January 2022 and March 2025.

Similar Papers

Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey (2026.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent election cycles have seen a large number of false information spread across social media and news platforms.
Approach: They propose a framework for automated claim verification using Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation.
Outcome: The proposed frameworks are based on large-scale models and new methods such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG).
Automated Justification Production for Claim Veracity in Fact Checking: A Survey on Architectures and Approaches (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current research focuses on predicting claim veracity through metadata analysis and language scrutiny, with an emphasis on justifying verdicts.
Approach: They propose a comprehensive taxonomy for categorizing works based on various criteria and propose scalable methodologies for improving fact-checking explainability.
Outcome: The proposed taxonomy identifies challenges while proposing future directions in fact-checking explainability.
MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing efforts to verify factual claims are limited by small datasets or artificially constructed datasets.
Approach: They propose to use the largest publicly available dataset of naturally occurring factual claims for automatic claim verification.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms baseline models and evidence pages significantly.
A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking (2022.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Fact-checking is an essential task in journalism due to the speed with which information and misinformation can spread in the media ecosystem.
Approach: They propose to use natural language processing to automate fact-checking by identifying common concepts and defining definitions.
Outcome: The proposed method can predict the veracity of claims using natural language processing, machine learning, and databases.
Automated Fact Checking: Task Formulations, Methods and Future Directions (C18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research on fact checking has focused on misinformation . however, relevant papers and articles have been published in research communities that are unaware of each other and use inconsistent terminology.
Approach: They propose avenues for future NLP research on automated fact checking . they highlight the use of evidence as an important distinguishing factor .
Outcome: The proposed methods unify the task formulations and methodologies across papers and authors.
Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: SciFact is a dataset of 1.4K expert-written scientific claims paired with evidence-containing abstracts annotated with labels and rationales.
Approach: They construct a dataset of 1.4K scientific claims paired with evidence-containing abstracts annotated with labels and rationales to test their system.
Outcome: The proposed system can verify claims related to COVID-19 by identifying evidence from the CORD-19 corpus.
Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claims (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Lack of a standardized evaluation framework impedes assessment and comparison of claim extraction methods.
Approach: They propose a framework for evaluating claim extraction in the context of fact-checking . they also introduce Claimify, an LLM-based claim extraction method .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation framework outperforms existing methods in the evaluation of claim extraction methods.
Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wild (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work makes simplifying assumptions in retrieval that depart from real-world use cases: no access to evidence, access to curated evidence, or access to published evidence after a claim was made.
Approach: They propose a pipeline to check claims using raw evidence from the web . they restrict their retriever to only search documents available prior to the claim's making .
Outcome: The proposed method is based on a political claim dataset and shows that the evidence summary produced by the system is reliable and relevant to answering key questions.
Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Steady progress has been made in fact-checking and its orthogonal tasks.
Approach: They propose to use fact-checking explanations to explain predictions by comparing existing explanations against desirable properties to find out what makes for good explanations.
Outcome: The proposed explanations are compared against desirable properties and show how they may lead to improvements in the research area.
WatClaimCheck: A new Dataset for Claim Entailment and Inference (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset for automated fact checking is presented . premise articles are used to verify the veracity of claims .
Approach: They propose a dataset for automated fact checking and an evaluation of state of the art algorithms.
Outcome: The proposed model improves retrieval quality of passages in premise articles . the proposed model predicts claim veracity by inference from premise article .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations