Whether LLMs Know If They Know: Identifying Knowledge Boundaries via Debiased Historical In-Context Learning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for active retrieval (AR) rely on training classification models or using the confidence of the model’s answer to determine knowledge boundaries. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to identify knowledge boundaries in active retrieval by retrieving historical queries as high-confidence in-context examples. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on four QA benchmarks show that DH-ICL achieves performance comparable to full retrieval on LLaMA with only half the number of retrievals, without any additional training. |
Similar Papers
Answer When Needed, Forget When Not: Language Models Pretend to Forget via In-Context Knowledge Unlearning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly required to selectively unlearn specific information. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which fine-tunes pre-trained LLMs to enable prompt unlearning of target knowledge within the context while preserving unrelated information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves up to 95% forget accuracy while retaining 80% of unrelated knowledge, significantly outperforming baselines in both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. |
Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive prowess in solving a wide range of tasks with world knowledge, but it remains unclear how well they perceive their factual knowledge boundaries. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a retrieval augmentation approach to enhance LLMs' awareness of factual knowledge boundaries to analyze factual and factual information in open-domain question answering (QA) |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves LLMs’ QA and judgemental capabilities by integrating supporting documents with the questions. |
LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Fact-Centric Retrieval Augmented Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) exhibit significant biases in evaluation tasks, especially in preferentially rating and favoring self-generated content. |
| Approach: | They propose to simulate two critical phases of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks where keyword extraction and factual accuracy take precedence over stylistic elements. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model emulates two critical phases of the retrieval-augmented generation framework. |
Dynamic Uncertainty Ranking: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented In-Context Learning for Long-Tail Knowledge in LLMs (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that in-context learning (ICL) with retriever augmentation can help LLMs better capture long-tail knowledge, reducing their reliance on pre-trained data. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning-based dynamic uncertainty ranking method that accounts for the varying impact of each retrieved sample on LLM predictions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baseline models on question-answering datasets by 2.76% and 5.96% on long-tail questions that elude zero-shot inference. |
Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Guy Mor-Lan, Omer Goldman, Matan Eyal, Adi Mayrav Gilady, Sivan Eiger, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Reut Tsarfaty
| Challenge: | Multilingual large language models have minimized the fluency gap between languages, but they are exposed to the risk of biases as knowledge and norms may propagate across languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a test set with 2,156 questions in 12 languages to quantify models' biases . they show a global bias towards answers relevant to the US-locale . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can answer locale-ambiguous questions in 12 languages. |
Can We Instruct LLMs to Compensate for Position Bias? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies reveal that position bias in large language models (LLMs) leads to difficulty in accessing information retrieved from the retriever. |
| Approach: | They propose to direct LLMs to allocate more attention towards a selected segment of the context through prompting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the performance of large language models by promoting instruction with an exact document index. |
Leveraging In-Context Learning for Political Bias Testing of LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing probing methods for evaluating LLMs with political questions have limited stability and are unreliable. |
| Approach: | They propose to use human survey data as in-context examples to query LLMs with political questions to evaluate their potential biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task improves the stability of question-based bias evaluation and may be used to compare instruction-tuned models to their base versions. |
Debiasing Large Language Models with Structured Knowledge (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to reduce biases in pre-training models are hampered by their performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that utilizes structured knowledge to mitigate bias in LLMs . their method obviates the need for training from scratch, thus offering enhanced scalability . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines in the debiasing ability. |
Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on in-context learning mechanisms are not consistent . current research identifies two main approaches to explain the ICL mechanism . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms by focusing on regression tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can solve regression problems and then measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. |
DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Retrievalaugmented LLMs have been used to ground LLM in external knowledge . a gap exists in the current landscape regarding the effectiveness of grounding LLM on heterogeneous knowledge sources. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that uses symbolic language to generate symbolic queries . they use a dataset that is generated using predefined reasoning chains and human annotation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms previous approaches by a significant margin in QA tasks over text. |