Rethinking Prompt-based Debiasing in Large Language Model (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing prompt-based methods for debiasing are often superficial and lack a thorough understanding of complex bias concepts.
Approach: They analyze a BBQ and stereoSet benchmarks to examine the assumption that large language models understand biases.
Outcome: The proposed model misclassified 90% of unbiased content as biased despite high accuracy on BBQ dataset . the proposed model may have been flawed in previous attempts to debiase .

Similar Papers

Take Care of Your Prompt Bias! Investigating and Mitigating Prompt Bias in Factual Knowledge Extraction (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research shows that pre-trained language models suffer from “prompt bias” in factual knowledge extraction.
Approach: They propose a representation-based approach to mitigate prompt bias during inference time by querying the model and removing it from its internal representations to generate debiased representations.
Outcome: The proposed approach corrects the overfitted performance caused by prompt bias and significantly improves prompt retrieval capability.
Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have tried to evaluate and mitigate social biases accurately using limited prompts.
Approach: They investigate the sensitivity of Large Language Models when changing prompt variations . they found that LLM rankings fluctuate across prompts for both task performance and social bias .
Outcome: The results show that LLM rankings fluctuate when changing prompt variations .
On Measuring Social Biases in Prompt-Based Multi-Task Learning (2022.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large body of work within prompt engineering attempts to understand the effects of input forms and prompts in achieving superior performance.
Approach: They propose a large-scale text-to-text language model trained using prompts . they consider two different forms of semantically equivalent inputs - question-answer format and premise-hypothesis format .
Outcome: The proposed model can generalize into novel forms of language and handle novel tasks.
Bias after Prompting: Persistent Discrimination in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dangerous assumption is that biases do not transfer from pre-trained large language models to adapted models.
Approach: They validate the bias transfer hypothesis by using prompt adaptations to study biases in causal models . they find that popular prompt-based mitigation methods do not consistently prevent biase transferring .
Outcome: The results invalidate the assumption that biases do not transfer from pre-trained models to adapted models.
Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models inherit societal biases against protected groups and can be subject to functionally resembling cognitive bias.
Approach: They propose a framework to uncover, evaluate, and mitigate cognitive bias in large language models by using a dataset containing 13,465 prompts to evaluate LLM decisions on different cognitive biases.
Outcome: The proposed framework uncovers, evaluates, and mitigates cognitive bias in large language models, particularly in high-stakes decision-making tasks.
“Thinking” Fair and Slow: On the Efficacy of Structured Prompts for Debiasing Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing debiasing techniques are typically training-based or require access to the model’s internals and output distributions, so they are inaccessible to end-users looking to adapt LLM outputs for their particular needs.
Approach: They propose a system-based iterative framework that uses System 2 thinking processes to induce logical, reflective, and critical text generation with single, multi-step, instruction, and role-based variants.
Outcome: The proposed framework significantly improves over other frameworks demonstrating lower mean bias in the outputs with competitive performance on the downstream tasks.
Can Prompt Probe Pretrained Language Models? Understanding the Invisible Risks from a Causal View (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found prompt-based probing evaluations inaccurate, inconsistent and unreliable.
Approach: They propose to conduct debiasing via causal intervention to uncover biases in probing evaluations . authors argue that prompt-based probing is inaccurate, inconsistent and unreliable .
Outcome: This paper examines the effectiveness of prompt-based probing in pretrained language models . it highlights critical biases which could induce biased results and conclusions . authors suggest rethinking criteria for evaluating better pretrained models based on such evaluations .
Characterizing Positional Bias in Large Language Models: A Multi-Model Evaluation of Prompt Order Effects (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models can be influenced by various forms of biases, says a new study . positional bias affects how LLMs interpret and weigh information, the authors say .
Approach: a new study examines the impact of positional bias on large language models . positional biased models prioritize items based on their position rather than content or quality .
Outcome: a new study shows that LLMs prioritize items based on their position rather than content or quality . the positional bias affects how LLM interpret and weigh information, the authors say .
Beyond Performance: Quantifying and Mitigating Label Bias in LLMs (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models exhibit undesirable preference toward predicting certain answers over others, despite their adaptability to diverse tasks.
Approach: They propose a label bias calibration method that outperforms recent calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms calibration approaches for improving performance and mitigating label bias.
Co2PT: Mitigating Bias in Pre-trained Language Models through Counterfactual Contrastive Prompt Tuning (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pre-trained language models can encode unfair social biases from large pre-training corpora and even amplify biase in downstream applications.
Approach: They propose a *debias-while-prompt tuning* method for mitigating biases via counterfactual contrastive prompt tuning on downstream tasks.
Outcome: The proposed method can mitigate biases on three extrinsic bias benchmarks and adapt to existing debiased language models.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations