The Million Authors Corpus: A Cross-Lingual and Cross-Domain Wikipedia Dataset for Authorship Verification (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Authorship verification (AV) is a crucial task for identity verification, accountlinking, historical linguistics, and AI-generated text identification. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Wikipedia's Million Authors Corpus to examine authorship verification models on a broad scale. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes 60.08M textual chunks, contributed by 1.29M Wikipedia authors. |
Similar Papers
WikiAtomicEdits: A Multilingual Corpus of Wikipedia Edits for Modeling Language and Discourse (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a corpus of 43 million atomic edits is available for Wikipedia edit history . edits are instances in which a human editor has inserted a single contiguous phrase into, or deleted a contigous phrase from, an existing sentence. |
| Approach: | They use Wikipedia edit history to mine atomic edits across 8 languages . they find edits contain instances in which a human editor has inserted a single phrase into, or deleted a contiguous phrase from, an existing sentence. |
| Outcome: | The data show that edits differ from the language observed in standard corpora and that models trained on edits encode different aspects of semantics and discourse than models trained in raw text. |
Learning Universal Authorship Representations (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Rafael A. Rivera-Soto, Olivia Elizabeth Miano, Juanita Ordonez, Barry Y. Chen, Aleem Khan, Marcus Bishop, Nicholas Andrews
| Challenge: | authorship verification has traditionally relied on modeling stylometric linguistic properties . but neural methods introduce a tradeoff: they obviate the need for manual feature design . |
| Approach: | They propose to use domain-specific features to improve authorship representations . they propose to study Amazon reviews, fanfiction short stories, and Reddit comments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform existing methods in large-scale authorship verification scenarios. |
Models and Datasets for Cross-Lingual Summarisation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have witnessed increased interest in abstractive summarisation thanks to the popularity of neural network models and the availability of datasets containing hundreds of thousands of document-summary pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose to create a cross-lingual summarisation corpus with long documents in a source language associated with multi-sentence summaries in . target language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task can be applied to several other languages and covers twelve languages and directions. |
Can Large Language Models Identify Authorship? (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capacity for reasoning and problem-solving, but their potential in authorship analysis remains under-explored. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate explicit linguistic features into LLMs to provide explanations into their reasoning processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models demonstrate their ability to perform zero-shot, end-to-end authorship verification effectively and provide explainability through explicit linguistic features. |
Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Identifying the author of a text is one of the most versatile NLP tasks, with applications ranging from plagiarism detection to forensics and monitoring the activity of cyber-criminals. |
| Approach: | They propose five new public splits over the PAN dataset to isolate and identify biases related to the text topic and to the author’s writing style. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are competitive with state-of-the-art methods and generalize better on dark reddit datasets. |
GerAV: Towards New Heights in German Authorship Verification using Fine-Tuned LLMs on a New Benchmark (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Authorship verification (AV) is a task of determining whether two texts were written by the same author. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for German AV comprising over 400k labeled text pairs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines and state-of-the-art models by 0.09 and surpasses GPT-5 in a zero-shot setting by 0.08. |
The Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpus (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The corpus contains reviews in English, Japanese, German, French, Spanish, and Chinese, which were collected between 2015 and 2019 . |
| Approach: | They propose to use mean absolute error (MAE) instead of classification accuracy for this task since MAE accounts for ordinal nature of the ratings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model uses mean absolute error (MAE) instead of classification accuracy since MAE accounts for ordinal nature of the ratings. |
The DReaM Corpus: A Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Grammars for the World’s Languages (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Until recently, language descriptions were available in paper form only, with indexes as the only search aid. |
| Approach: | They propose to digitize a multilingual corpus of language descriptions and annotate it with various meta, word, and text attributes to make searching and analysis easier and more useful. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus is searchable through a couple of well-established corpus infrastructures. |
Transforming Wikipedia into a Large-Scale Fine-Grained Entity Type Corpus (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | et al. (2017): WiFiNE annotated with fine-grained entity types . lack of a well-established training corpus makes it difficult to manually annotate the amount of data needed for training. |
| Approach: | They propose an English corpus annotated with fine-grained entity types based on Wikipedia . they use heuristics to build a large, high quality, annotating corpus using 2 manually annotized benchmarks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system outperforms the existing systems with two datasets and gains a 2.8 macro F1 score. |
Who Wrote it and Why? Prompting Large-Language Models for Authorship Verification (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing AV techniques, including stylometric and deep learning, face limitations in terms of data requirements and lack of explainability. |
| Approach: | They propose a technique that leverages Large-Language Models (LLMs) to provide step-by-step stylometric explanation prompts to verify authorship. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, operates effectively with limited training data, and enhances interpretability through intuitive explanations. |