Can Input Attributions Explain Inductive Reasoning in In-Context Learning? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | interpreting the internal process of neural models has long been a challenge . despite rapid progress, there are still questions bridging the IA and MI eras . |
| Approach: | They propose to use input attribution methods to interpret in-context learning . they find that a certain simple IA method works best in large models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is the best for interpreting LLM-based ICL, but the larger the model, the harder it is to interpret it. |
Similar Papers
Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on in-context learning mechanisms are not consistent . current research identifies two main approaches to explain the ICL mechanism . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms by focusing on regression tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can solve regression problems and then measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. |
The Mystery of In-Context Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Interpretation and Analysis (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) is a capability that enables large language models to excel in proficiency through demonstration examples. |
| Approach: | They present a survey on the interpretation and analysis of in-context learning . they focus on theoretical and empirical perspectives on the concept . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform tasks with minimal examples without re-training and has demonstrated proficiency across various tasks with a minimal set of task-oriented examples. |
In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectors (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful new learning paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use a model with a prompt and a query to learn a mapping based on two examples to produce the output. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn functions from a simple structure based on a training set and a single task vector calculated from the training set. |
What In-Context Learning “Learns” In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can perform in-context learning (ICL) with only a few demonstrations, but its mechanisms are not well-understood. |
| Approach: | They characterize two ways in which LLMs leverage demonstrations to solve tasks with a few demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves non-trivial performance with only TR, and TR does not improve with larger models or more demonstrations. |
Towards Understanding the Relationship between In-context Learning and Compositional Generalization (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning is an inductive bias for compositional generalization, but many deep neural architectures struggle with this ability. |
| Approach: | They propose to force a causal Transformer to in-context learn to promote compositional generalization by using earlier examples to generalize to later ones. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can solve 'ordinary' learning problems by utilizing earlier examples to generalize to later ones, i.e., in-context learning. |
On the Feasibility of In-Context Probing for Data Attribution (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context probing (ICP) can be used to identify training data that contributes to model outputs, but many data attribution methods, such as influence functions, use model gradients and are computationally expensive. |
| Approach: | They propose to use in-context probing (ICP) to proxy for gradient-based data attribution for data selection under conditions contingent on data similarity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be used to identify training data that contribute to model outputs and fine tune models on training data. |
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learning (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines the cognitive inductive biases that make language learning possible. |
| Approach: | They structurally bias transformer language models by pretraining on synthetic data . they then evaluate their inductive biases by fine-tuning on three different languages . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method predisposes transformer models to three types of inductive biases . it also fine-tunes the models on three typologically-distant human languages . |
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis. (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained large language models have exhibited an impressive ability to learn in context across various domains, e.g., code generation, education, medicine and even medicine. |
| Approach: | They taxonomize existing candidate theories into three competing hypotheses that explain LLMs’ ability to learn in context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn a task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. |
A Survey of Inductive Reasoning for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kedi Chen, Dezhao Ruan, Yuhao Dan, Yaoting Wang, Siyu Yan, Xuecheng Wu, Yinqi Zhang, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, Liang He, Biqing Qi, Linyang Li, Qipeng Guo, Xiaoming Shi, Wei Zhang
| Challenge: | Inductive reasoning is an important task for large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a survey of inductive reasoning for large language models . they categorize methods into three main areas: post-training enhancement, test-time exploration, and data augmentation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves inductive reasoning in large language models. |