| Challenge: | Recent debiasing approaches target different demographic groups, harming fairness and discrimination. |
| Approach: | They propose a model debiasing framework which targets stereotypes by unlearning stereotype forgetting and anti-stereotype retention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in mitigating bias while retaining language modeling capabilities. |
Similar Papers
Co2PT: Mitigating Bias in Pre-trained Language Models through Counterfactual Contrastive Prompt Tuning (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models can encode unfair social biases from large pre-training corpora and even amplify biase in downstream applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a *debias-while-prompt tuning* method for mitigating biases via counterfactual contrastive prompt tuning on downstream tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can mitigate biases on three extrinsic bias benchmarks and adapt to existing debiased language models. |
A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learning (2022.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large-scale, pretrained vision-language models are growing in popularity due to impressive performance on downstream tasks with minimal finetuning. |
| Approach: | They propose to apply ranking metrics to image-text representations to investigate bias measures and debiasing methods to reduce various bias measures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces bias measures with minimal degradation to image-text representations. |
End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corpora (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that strong natural language understanding models are prone to relying on unwanted dataset biases without learning the underlying task. |
| Approach: | They propose two learning strategies to train neural models that are more robust to dataset biases and transfer better to out-of-domain datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve robustness in all settings and transfer better to out-of-domain datasets. |
Auto-Debias: Debiasing Masked Language Models with Automated Biased Prompts (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to mitigate human-like biases in pretrained language models are based on external corpora and require a distribution alignment loss to mitigate them. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic method to mitigate biases in pretrained language models by searching for biased prompts such that cloze-style completions are the most different with respect to different demographic groups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces biases in pretrained language models, including gender and racial bias, and improves fairness of the models. |
Can Machine Unlearning Reduce Social Bias in Language Models? (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Omkar Dige, Diljot Arneja, Tsz Fung Yau, Qixuan Zhang, Mohammad Bolandraftar, Xiaodan Zhu, Faiza Khattak
| Challenge: | Existing methods for mitigating bias in language models are expensive and time-consuming . comparative studies have not evaluated their respective advantages and disadvantages . |
| Approach: | They propose to use Partitioned Contrastive Gradient Unlearning and Negation via Task Vector to reduce social biases in open-source language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform PCGU and DPO in debiasing models . the proposed methods can be easily tuned to balance the trade-off between bias reduction and generation quality . |
An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Models (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has shown pre-trained language models capture social biases from the large amounts of text they are trained on. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Counterfactual Data Augmentation, Dropout, Iterative Nullspace Projection, Self-Debias, and SentenceDebia as bias mitigation techniques to quantify their effectiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques are Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA), Dropout, Iterative Nullspace Projection, Self-Debias, and SentenceDebia. |
An Empirical Analysis of Parameter-Efficient Methods for Debiasing Pre-Trained Language Models (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models inherit more human-like biases from the training corpora, causing computationally expensive problems. |
| Approach: | They propose parameter-efficient methods in combination with counterfactual data augmentation for bias mitigation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are effective in mitigating gender bias, prompt tuning is more suitable for GPT-2 than BERT, and less effective when it comes to racial and religious bias. |
Self-Debiasing Large Language Models: Zero-Shot Recognition and Reduction of Stereotypes (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan Aponte, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Mehrab Tanjim, Tong Yu, Hanieh Deilamsalehy, Ruiyi Zhang, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Nedim Lipka, Deonna Owens, Jiuxiang Gu
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit harmful social biases, but they are often difficult to train and modify. |
| Approach: | They leverage the zero-shot capabilities of large language models to reduce stereotyping . they introduce a technique called zero- shot self-debiasing to reduce bias . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique reduces stereotyping across nine different social groups while relying on the LLM itself and a simple prompt. |
Disentangling Biased Knowledge from Reasoning in Large Language Models via Machine Unlearning (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zheyuan Liu, Suraj Maharjan, Fanyou Wu, Rahil Parikh, Belhassen Bayar, Srinivasan H. Sengamedu, Meng Jiang
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to disentangle biased knowledge from reasoning are sub-optimal . entangled data makes curation difficult, leading to inclusion of sensitive, toxic data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that selectively removes biased knowledge while preserving reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves fairness accuracy by 14.7% and reasoning performance by 62.6% across multiple LLMs. |
When and Why Does Bias Mitigation Work? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural models exploit shallow surface features to perform language understanding tasks, rather than learning the deeper language understanding and reasoning skills that practitioners desire. |
| Approach: | They propose to use model debiasing techniques to pressure models away from spurious features and to use them to learn useful representations instead. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods increase models' reliance on hidden biases instead of learning robust features that help them solve a task. |