Multilingual Knowledge Editing with Language-Agnostic Factual Neurons (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to update factual knowledge overlook connections of same knowledge between different languages, resulting in knowledge conflicts and limited edit performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to edit multilingual knowledge simultaneously that avoids knowledge conflicts and improves edit performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method avoids knowledge conflicts and improves edit performance on bi-ZsRE and MzsRE benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
Editing Across Languages: A Survey of Multilingual Knowledge Editing (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge Editing is a growing subdomain of model editing focused on ensuring factual edits generalize across languages. |
| Approach: | They present a taxonomy of multilingual knowledge editing methods and benchmarks . authors summarize key findings on method effectiveness and transfer patterns . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are compared against available benchmarks and benchmark datasets. |
Retrieval-Augmented Multilingual Knowledge Editing (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing (KE) is an effective and economical alternative to inject new knowledge or to fix factual errors in Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual knowledge editing method that can be used to update knowledge in LLMs by concatenating new knowledge retrieved from a knowledge base with users’ prompts before querying an LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baseline knowledge editing methods by a significant margin and is scalable to real-word application scenarios. |
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique to adapt large language models to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual dataset to translate a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset from English to Chinese and then to evaluate their performance in Chinese. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can change model performance on several special cases without retraining from scratch. |
Edit Once, Update Everywhere: A Simple Framework for Cross-Lingual Knowledge Synchronization in LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to update large language models focus on single-language editing or basic multilingual editing, failing to achieve true cross-linguistic knowledge synchronization. |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-linguistic knowledge democracy edit technique to improve cross-lingual performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves cross-lingual performance while maintaining high accuracy in monolingual settings. |
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are not immune to issues of factual accuracy or logically consistent. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will present cutting-edge methods and practical tools for editing Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The aim of this course is to familiarize researchers with the latest advancements and emerging strategies in the realm of knowledge editing for LLMs. |
MLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on knowledge editing focus on monolingual scenarios, neglecting the complexities presented by multilingual contexts and multi-hop reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the adaptability of multilingual knowledge editing methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the adaptability of multilingual knowledge editing methods across five languages. |
Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has demonstrated the power of large language models in recalling knowledge and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to erase shortcut neurons to mitigate the associated risks . 20% of the failures are attributed to shortcuts, they find . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces failures in multi-hop knowledge editing caused by shortcuts by 20% . |
Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual language models store factual knowledge across languages but struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a linear shortcut method that bypasses computations in the final layers . this method improves accuracy and cross-lingual consistency . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves prediction accuracy and cross-lingual consistency. |
Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual large-scale pretrained language models store factual knowledge, but large variations are observed across languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a ranking-based consistency metric to evaluate cross-lingual consistency of factual knowledge in multilingual PLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric evaluates cross-lingual consistency of factual knowledge across languages independently from accuracy. |
From Neurons to Semantics: Evaluating Cross-Linguistic Alignment Capabilities of Large Language Models via Neurons Alignment (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing alignment benchmarks focus on sentence embeddings, but prior research has shown that neural models tend to induce a non-smooth representation space, which impact of semantic alignment evaluation on low-resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel cross-lingual alignment evaluation method based on the consistency of parallel sentences to assess model alignment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves a correlation of 0.9556 with downstream tasks performance and 0.8524 with transferability even with a small dataset. |