Unstructured Minds, Predictable Machines: A Comparative Study of Narrative Cohesion in Human and LLM Stream-of-Consciousness Writing (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Stream-of-consciousness narratives are a challenge for large language models (LLMs) authors examined differences between human and LLM-generated narratives to assess narrative coherence and personality expression. |
| Approach: | They generate SoC narratives by prompting LLMs with the first half of SoC-essays while either providing the models with the personality characteristics (Big Five) or omitting them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models showed low similarity between LLM-generated continuations and original human texts, as measured by cosine similarity, perplexity, and BLEU scores. |
Similar Papers
Temporal Flattening in LLM-Generated Text: Comparing Human and LLM Writing Trajectories (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in daily applications, from content generation to code writing. |
| Approach: | They construct a longitudinal dataset of 412 human authors and 6,086 documents spanning 2012–2024 and compare them to trajectories generated by three representative LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLMs produce greater lexical diversity but exhibit substantially reduced semantic and cognitive–emotional drift relative to humans. |
Beyond Discrete Personas: Personality Modeling Through Journal Intensive Conversations (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs rely on static, predefined personas to capture dynamic and evolving nature of human personalities. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset with 400,000 conversations and a framework for generating personalized conversations using long-form journal entries from Reddit. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates high-quality, personality-rich dialogues grounded in reddit journal entries. |
How LLMs Comprehend Temporal Meaning in Narratives: A Case Study in Cognitive Evaluation of LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit increasingly sophisticated linguistic capabilities, yet the extent to which these models reflect human-like cognition versus advanced pattern recognition remains an open question. |
| Approach: | They conduct a series of targeted experiments to assess whether LLMs construct semantic representations and pragmatic inferences in a human-like manner. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to assess the cognitive and linguistic capabilities of large language models (LLMs). |
Mary, the Cheeseburger-Eating Vegetarian: Do LLMs Recognize Incoherence in Narratives? (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Karin De Langis, Püren Öncel, Ryan Peters, Andrew Elfenbein, Laura Kristen Allen, Andreas Schramm, Dongyeop Kang
| Challenge: | Contemporary models of (human) reading comprehension characterize comprehension as a dynamic process in which the reader continually builds and updates representations to maintain coherence and integrate new information with prior knowledge. |
| Approach: | They use a paired narrative dataset to examine the extent to which large language models can reliably separate incoherent and coherent stories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models do not eliminate the deficits in the model internal state and behavior. |
Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yufei Tian, Tenghao Huang, Miri Liu, Derek Jiang, Alexander Spangher, Muhao Chen, Jonathan May, Nanyun Peng
| Challenge: | a recent HCI study has pointed to gaps in machine storytelling ability at the global level . authors show that LLMs have less suspense and less tension than human stories . |
| Approach: | They propose a computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework analyzes narratives through three discourse-level aspects . it shows that LLMs fall short of human abilities in discourse understanding . |
BIASEDTALES-ML: A Multilingual Dataset for Analyzing Narrative Attribute Distributions in LLM-Generated Stories (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) focus primarily on English, leaving the cross-lingual generalization of aligned behavior underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a structured generator-extractor pipeline and a multi-dimensional distributional analysis framework to examine how narrative attributes vary across languages, models, and social conditions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reveals substantial cross-lingual variability in narrative generation patterns, indicating that distributions observed in English do not always exhibit similar characteristics in other languages, particularly in lower-resource settings. |
Systematic Evaluation of Auto-Encoding and Large Language Model Representations for Capturing Author States and Traits (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Khushboo Singh, Vasudha Varadarajan, Adithya V Ganesan, August Håkan Nilsson, Nikita Soni, Syeda Mahwish, Pranav Chitale, Ryan L. Boyd, Lyle Ungar, Richard N Rosenthal, H. Schwartz
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in human-centered applications, yet their ability to model diverse psychological constructs is not well understood. |
| Approach: | They evaluated a range of Transformer-LMs to predict psychological variables across five major dimensions: affect, substance use, mental health, sociodemographics, and personality. |
| Outcome: | The models predict affect, substance use, mental health, sociodemographics, and personality across five major dimensions. |
Modeling, Evaluating, and Embodying Personality in LLMs: A Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Iago Alves Brito, Julia Soares Dollis, Fernanda Bufon Färber, Pedro Schindler Freire Brasil Ribeiro, Rafael Teixeira Sousa, Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão Filho
| Challenge: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Approach: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy analyzes the limitations of existing methods and identifies key research gaps. |
An Empirical Analysis of the Writing Styles of Persona-Assigned LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts to "personalize" large language models by assigning them specific personas are limited by current knowledge of how well they perform. |
| Approach: | They use a style embedding model to analyze writing styles of persona-assigned LLMs . they find significant style differences between personas using Kullback-Leibler divergence . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows significant differences in writing styles among personas across socio-demographic groups. |
BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for embedding human personality traits into LLMs are limited by realism and validity issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large-scale dataset to embed human personality traits into LLMs . they use supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization to train LLM models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform prompting on personality assessments and IPIP-NEO, and show higher conscientiousness, agreeableness, lower extraversion, and lower neuroticism on reasoning tasks. |