Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mingyu Jin, Weidi Luo, Sitao Cheng, Xinyi Wang, Wenyue Hua, Ruixiang Tang, William Yang Wang, Yongfeng Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing LLMs operate as an opaque process without explicit separation between knowledge retrieval and reasoning steps, making the decision-making process unclear and disorganized. |
| Approach: | They propose a language model inference paradigm that decomposes the complex inference process into two distinct and clear actions: (1) memory recall: which retrieves relevant knowledge, and (2) reasoning: which performs reasoning steps based on the recalled knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed paradigm decomposes the inference process into two distinct and clear actions, memory and reason, guiding the model to distinguish between steps that require knowledge retrieval and those that involve reasoning. |
Similar Papers
The Reasoning-Memorization Interplay in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel on a variety of reasoning benchmarks, but struggle to generalize to unseen questions due to over-reliance on memorized training examples. |
| Approach: | They propose to identify a set of linear features in the model’s residual stream that govern the balance between genuine reasoning and memory recall. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be manipulated to activate the most relevant problem-solving capabilities during answer generation. |
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models. |
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of Large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier to generate plausible candidates and provide timely process-driven feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that LLM2 improves accuracy on GSM8K and self-consistency increases major@20 accuracy. |
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial. |
| Approach: | This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning. |
Tracing and Dissecting How LLMs Recall Factual Knowledge for Real World Questions (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have shown promising ability to perform commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-dimensional analysis framework that incorporates token back-tracing and token decoding to uncover how LLMs conduct factual knowledge recall. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that LLMs lack relevant knowledge but struggle to select the most accurate information based on context during the retrieval and rerank phase. |
Memorization ≠ Understanding: Do Large Language Models Have the Ability of Scenario Cognition? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to assess LLMs’ scenario cognition . they examine the ability to link semantic scenario elements with their arguments in context . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses large language models’ scenario cognition . it shows that current models rely on superficial memorization, failing to achieve robust semantic scenario cognition even in simple cases. |
How Do Multilingual Language Models Remember Facts? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior research has focused on English monolingual models, but how these mechanisms generalize to non-English languages remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They analyze three multilingual LLMs to find out how they can generalize recall mechanisms . they find that subject enrichment is language-independent, object extraction is language dependent . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better in multilingual contexts than in English models . the model is more efficient in multi-lingual context, but it is more complex in multilinguistic models compared to English models. |
FAC2E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs’ Capability Evaluation that dissociates the language-related capabilities from cognition-related ones. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework dissociates the language-related capabilities from cognition-related ones and breaks down the process of applying a specific capability into three sub-steps: recalling relevant knowledge, utilizing knowledge, and solving problems. |
LM2: A Simple Society of Language Models Solves Complex Reasoning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that providing guidance via decomposing the original question into multiple subproblems elicits more robustness in LLM reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a language-based decomposition, solution and verification framework that modularizes the decomposer, solution, and verification into three different language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods on in- and out-domain reasoning problems, outperforming the best baselines by 8.1% on MATH, 7.71% on JEEBench, and 9.7% on MedQA problems. |
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |