Challenge: Existing defense mechanisms have not fully deleted harmful knowledge in large language models (LLMs) Existing methods to address safety alignment have not completely deleted harmful information in LLMs.
Approach: They propose a safety alignment strategy that uses scoring neurons to identify useful knowledge in LLMs and pruning the gradients of neurons in U to preserve beneficial information.
Outcome: The proposed method significantly improves model safety while maintaining utility compared to existing methods.

Similar Papers

Unraveling LLM Jailbreaks Through Safety Knowledge Neurons (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress in alignment, ensuring safer and more reliable outputs.
Approach: They propose a neuron-level interpretability method that focuses on the role of safety-related knowledge neurons to improve model robustness against jailbreak attacks.
Outcome: The proposed method reduces attack success rates across multiple LLMs and outperforms all baseline defenses.
CAP: Controllable Alignment Prompting for Unlearning in LLMs (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for modifying parameters are unsystematic and rely on empirical experience.
Approach: They propose a controllable alignment prompting for unlearning framework that decouples unlearning into a learnable prompt optimization process via reinforcement learning.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves precise, controllable unlearning without updating model parameters.
Can Textual Unlearning Solve Cross-Modality Safety Alignment? (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: integrating new modalities into large language models creates new attack surface . existing safety training techniques like SFT and RLHF are not feasible in multi-modal settings .
Approach: They explore whether unlearning in the textual domain can be effective for cross-modality safety alignment.
Outcome: The proposed approach reduces the Attack Success Rate (ASR) to less than 8% and preserves the utility.
Multitask-Bench: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adoption across a wide range of tasks, ranging from code generation to machine translation and sentiment analysis.
Approach: They propose to fine-tune LLMs on benign (non-harmful) data to ensure safe outputs.
Outcome: The proposed model reduces attack success rates across a range of tasks without compromising its usefulness.
Rendering Data Unlearnable by Exploiting LLM Alignment Mechanisms (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trained on massive, heterogeneous text corpora, raising serious concerns about the unauthorised use of proprietary or personal data during model training.
Approach: They propose a data-level defence that renders text unlearnable to LLMs by injecting carefully designed alignment-triggering disclaimers into the models' alignment mechanisms.
Outcome: The proposed approach exploits the models’ alignment mechanisms to prevent effective learning.
Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work attempted to implement a gradient ascent based approach to prevent LLMs from producing harmful output when faced with problematic prompts.
Approach: They propose a gradient ascent based approach to prevent LLMs from producing harmful output when faced with problematic prompts.
Outcome: The proposed approach eliminates harmful knowledge while preserving utility on normal prompts.
Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing safety evaluations of large language models aggregate harms under generic categories such as "Identity Hate" a bilingual benchmark identifies a selective safety trap, where defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on the target group.
Approach: They propose a bilingual adversarial benchmark to audit selective safety in large language models . defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on target group .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark identifies a selective safety trap in large language models . defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on the target group.
How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden States (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) rely on safety alignment to avoid malicious user inputs.
Approach: They employ weak classifiers to explain LLM safety through the intermediate hidden states.
Outcome: The proposed model can identify malicious and normal inputs and detect malicious ones without jailbreak.
Why Safeguarded Ships Run Aground? Aligned Large Language Models’ Safety Mechanisms Tend to Be Anchored in The Template Region (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Infilling a fixed template between the input instruction and initial model output is a common practice for existing LLMs, but it is vulnerable to inference-time jailbreak attacks.
Approach: They propose to fill a fixed template between the input instruction and initial model output and to detach safety mechanisms from the template region to mitigate the risk of inference-time jailbreak attacks.
Outcome: The proposed method is widespread across aligned LLMs and shows that it mitigates inference-time jailbreak vulnerabilities.
Ensuring Safe and High-Quality Outputs: A Guideline Library Approach for Language Models (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Guide-Align is a guideline-oriented approach to augment the safety and quality of Large Language Models.
Approach: They propose a guideline-oriented method to augment the safety and quality of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms existing methods on three benchmarks and shows significant improvements in security and quality.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations