| Challenge: | In recent years, natural language generation (NLG) techniques have advanced, but pose new security risks . this tutorial will be 3 hours long with a mix of lecture and hands-on examples for interactive audience participation. |
| Approach: | They present a tutorial on the security of natural language generation (NLG) they review the latest literature on the detection and obfuscation of deepfake text authorships . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial reviews the latest literature on the detection and obfuscation of deepfake text authorships. |
Similar Papers
MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing research has focused on evaluating detection methods for specific domains or language models. |
| Approach: | They build a testbed to detect texts from diverse human writings and LLMs using different detection methods. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the top performing detector can identify 84.12% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. |
Detecting Machine-Generated Text: Techniques and Challenges (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial focuses on machine-generated text and deepfakes. |
| Approach: | This tutorial aims to provide a comprehensive overview of text detection techniques . it will focus on machine-generated text and deepfakes . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial focuses on machine-generated text and deepfakes. |
PlagBench: Exploring the Duality of Large Language Models in Plagiarism Generation and Detection (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have raised concerns about the potential threats large language models pose to academic integrity and copyright protection. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset of 46.5K synthetic text pairs that represent three major types of plagiarism: verbatim copying, paraphrasing, and summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that GPT-3.5 Turbo can produce high-quality paraphrases and summaries without significantly increasing text complexity compared to GPT-4 Turbo. |
LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing detection tools rely on access to LLMs and can only distinguish between machine-generated and human-authored text. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool that can source text from specific LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can source text from specific LLMs, such as GPT-2, OPT, LLaMA, and others. |
Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Dominik Macko, Robert Moro, Adaku Uchendu, Ivan Srba, Jason Lucas, Michiharu Yamashita, Nafis Irtiza Tripto, Dongwon Lee, Jakub Simko, Maria Bielikova
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Language Modeling have birthed Large Language Models (LLMs), which exhibit significant improvements, including the ability to generate texts easily misconstrued as humanwritten. |
| Approach: | They compare authorship obfuscation methods against machine-generated text (MGT) in 11 languages and analyze their performance against 37 well-known AO methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can cause evasion of detection in all languages, with homoglyph attacks particularly successful. |
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xianjun Yang, Liangming Pan, Xuandong Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Linda Petzold, William Yang Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to an increase in synthetic content generation . the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be able to detect human-written content in real time. |
People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated text (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Qualitative analysis of experts’ free-form explanations shows that while they rely heavily on specific lexical clues (‘AI vocabulary’), they also pick up on more complex phenomena within the text (e.g., formality, originality, clarity). |
| Approach: | They hire annotators to read 300 non-fiction English articles, label them as either human-written or AI-generated, and provide paragraph-length explanations for their decisions. |
| Outcome: | The annotators who frequently use LLMs for writing tasks outperform commercial and open-source detectors even without evasion tactics like paraphrasing and humanization. |
On the Generalization of Training-based ChatGPT Detection Methods (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that training-based methods are ineffective to detect LLM generated texts from unseen tasks or topics which are not collected during training. |
| Approach: | They propose to train classification models to distinguish LLMs from human texts by a distribution shift caused by prompts, text lengths, topics, and language tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can detect LLMs from black-box models, but they suffer from distribution shifts due to a wide range of factors, including prompts, text lengths, topics, and language tasks. |
Learning to Rewrite: Generalized LLM-Generated Text Detection (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing detectors for Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to generalize in open-world settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to detect LLM-generated text with exceptional generalization to unseen domains by reinforcing LLMs’ inherent rewriting tendencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art detection methods by 23.04% in AUROC, 35.10% for out-of distribution tests, and 48.66% under adversarial attacks. |
WASA: WAtermark-based Source Attribution for Large Language Model-Generated Data (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xinyang Lu, Jingtan Wang, Zitong Zhao, Zhongxiang Dai, Chuan-Sheng Foo, See-Kiong Ng, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have impressive performance but intellectual property concerns are looming . a framework that can be used to perform source attribution for LLMs can be developed. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enables an LLM to generate synthetic texts with embedded watermarks that contain information about their source. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves source attribution accuracy and robustness against adversaries. |