Updating Large Language Models’ Memories with Time Constraints (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can modify their internal memory by incorporating the latest external knowledge, but in practical applications, outdated information may be inputted into LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage decoupling framework that separates the identification and computation of time constraints into a symbolic system and propose 'selective update' of internal memory based on time constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves ChatGPT performance by 60% and improves state-of-the-art LLM GPT-4. |
Similar Papers
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are not immune to issues of factual accuracy or logically consistent. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will present cutting-edge methods and practical tools for editing Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The aim of this course is to familiarize researchers with the latest advancements and emerging strategies in the realm of knowledge editing for LLMs. |
Remember This Event That Year? Assessing Temporal Information and Understanding in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly ubiquitous, yet their ability to effectively retain and reason about temporal information remains limited. |
| Approach: | They propose six metrics to assess three learning paradigms to enhance temporal knowledge acquisition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve performance and reduce incorrect outputs. |
SPECTRA: Faster Large Language Model Inference with Optimized Internal and External Speculation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to inference with Large Language Models (LLMs) are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for accelerating large language model inference without additional training or modification to the original LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods and achieves 4.08x speedups across benchmarks and LLM architectures. |
How Do Large Language Models Capture the Ever-changing World Knowledge? A Review of Recent Advances (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are impressive in solving tasks, but they can quickly be outdated after deployment. |
| Approach: | They provide a review of recent advances in aligning deployed large language models with the ever-changing world knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to perform various tasks directly through in-context learning or for further fine-tuning for domain-specific uses. |
Are Large Language Model Temporally Grounded? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives . sentence ordering in unlabelled texts is only weakly correlated with event ordering . |
| Approach: | They evaluate LLMs with textual narratives and evaluate their common-sense knowledge . they find that LLM models struggle the most with self-consistency . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models lack a consistent temporal model of textual narratives. |
Can Language Models Serve as Temporal Knowledge Bases? (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have only considered language models as knowledge bases in a static setting . memorizing conflicting information is still challenging for LMs and hinders memorization of other unrelated one-to-one relationships. |
| Approach: | They propose two requirements for treating language models as temporal knowledge bases . they propose a dataset which is aimed at probing temporally-scoped knowledge . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can store conflicting information and use stored knowledge for temporal knowledge queries. |
Time-Aware Language Models as Temporal Knowledge Bases (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Bhuwan Dhingra, Jeremy R. Cole, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Daniel Gillick, Jacob Eisenstein, William W. Cohen
| Challenge: | Existing language models are trained on snapshots of data collected at a specific moment in time. |
| Approach: | They propose a diagnostic dataset aimed at probing LMs for factual knowledge that changes over time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves memorization of seen facts and calibration on unseen facts from future time periods. |
Working Memory Identifies Reasoning Limits in Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models, we examine the limitations of their cognitive capabilities and their working memory. |
| Approach: | They examine the limitations of large language models from a scaling perspective . they also assess various prompting strategies, revealing their diverse impacts on LLM performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform poorly on n-back tasks and on prompting strategies. |
Towards Fast Multilingual LLM Inference: Speculative Decoding and Specialized Drafters (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing and are limited by high inference time in multilingual settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a training recipe for an assistant model in speculative decoding, which are leveraged to draft and-then its future tokens are verified by the target LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly speeds up inference time and out-of-domain speedup across various languages. |
Answer When Needed, Forget When Not: Language Models Pretend to Forget via In-Context Knowledge Unlearning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly required to selectively unlearn specific information. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which fine-tunes pre-trained LLMs to enable prompt unlearning of target knowledge within the context while preserving unrelated information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves up to 95% forget accuracy while retaining 80% of unrelated knowledge, significantly outperforming baselines in both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. |