Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit positional bias, struggling to utilize information from the middle or end of long contexts.
Approach: They propose to examine LLMs' long-context generalizations by probing their hidden representations.
Outcome: The proposed models excel at processing extended contexts while preserving their positional bias.

Similar Papers

What Context Features Can Transformer Language Models Use? (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that transformer-based language models benefit from conditioning on contexts of hundreds to thousands of previous tokens.
Approach: They propose to use lexical and structural information to ablate usable information in transformer language models.
Outcome: The proposed model improves when conditioning on contexts of thousands of previous tokens.
Self-Consistency Falls Short! The Adverse Effects of Positional Bias on Long-Context Problems (2026.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to improve long-context understanding of large language models lack scalability and stability.
Approach: They challenge the assumption that SC’s benefits generalize to long-context settings . they find that persistent position bias degrades performance on long-consistency tasks .
Outcome: The proposed approach fails to improve and actively degrades performance on long-context tasks.
Language Models Struggle to Use Representations Learned In-Context (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that large language models are capable of inducing rich representations of data that are seen in-context . a novel task, adaptive world modeling, shows that even the most performant LLMs cannot reliably leverage novel semantics defined in-constitut.
Approach: They propose to use in-context representations to induce rich representations of data . they also propose to probe models using a novel task to enable flexible deployment .
Outcome: The proposed model can use in-context representations to complete simple downstream tasks.
Can Calibration of Positional Encodings Enhance Long Context Utilization? (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models suffer from positional biases that reduce effective utilization of long contexts.
Approach: They propose a training-free framework for calibrating Positional Encodings at inference time.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves on needle-in-a-haystack and cross-chunk reasoning benchmarks and provides a lightweight method for improving long-context utilization.
Found in the middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilization (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models struggle to capture relevant information located in the middle of their input.
Approach: They propose a calibration mechanism that allows the model to attend to contexts faithfully according to their relevance even when they are in the middle.
Outcome: The proposed calibration mechanism mitigates this positional bias and improves retrieval-augmented generation performance.
Efficient Solutions For An Intriguing Failure of LLMs: Long Context Window Does Not Mean LLMs Can Analyze Long Sequences Flawlessly (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in comprehending and analyzing lengthy sequential inputs.
Approach: They propose to implement ad-hoc solutions that enhance LLMs’ performance on long input sequences by up to 50% while reducing API cost and latency by up . to address this limitation, they propose to use three datasets and two tasks to analyze news categorization and sentence analysis to evaluate their models.
Outcome: The proposed solutions significantly improve LLMs’ performance on long input sequences by up to 50% while reducing API cost and latency by up . to 93% and 50%, respectively.
Context Length Alone Hurts LLM Performance Despite Perfect Retrieval (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) often fail to scale their performance on long-context tasks performance in line with the context lengths they support.
Approach: They propose a model-agnostic mitigation strategy that transforms a long-context task into a short-concept one by prompting the model to recite the retrieved evidence before attempting to solve the problem.
Outcome: The proposed model improves on a long-context task up to 4% on RULER.
Lost in the Distance: Large Language Models Struggle to Capture Long-Distance Relational Knowledge (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in handling long contexts . however, as context length increases, LLMs struggle more with filtering out irrelevant information .
Approach: They propose to use unrelated sentences to capture relational knowledge over long contexts . they find that LLMs can handle edge noise with little impact, but can reason about distant relationships .
Outcome: The proposed model can handle edge noise with little impact, but its ability to reason about distant relationships declines as the noise grows.
On Positional Bias of Faithfulness for Long-form Summarization (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models exhibit positional bias in long-context settings, under-attending to information in the middle.
Approach: They compile eight human-annotated long-form summarization datasets to evaluate faithfulness . they find that LLMs faithfully summarize beginning and end of documents but neglect middle content .
Outcome: The proposed methods show that LLMs under-attend to information in the middle of inputs.
Racing Thoughts: Explaining Contextualization Errors in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for accomplishing a wide variety of language generation and classification tasks.
Approach: They propose a race conditions hypothesis to explain contextualization errors . they propose to use a variety of techniques to test the hypothesis .
Outcome: The proposed model fails to properly contextualize a financial institution if it does not include a bank . the proposed model is based on the race conditions hypothesis .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations