In-Context Learning May Not Elicit Trustworthy Reasoning: A-Not-B Errors in Pretrained Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in artificial intelligence have led to the creation of highly capable large language models (LLMs) that can perform tasks in a human-like manner, but lack infant-level cognitive abilities in certain areas. |
| Approach: | They designed a text-based multi-choice QA scenario similar to the A-Not-B error to test their inhibitory control abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that state-of-the-art LLMs perform well with in-context learning but make errors and show a drop of as many as 83.3% in reasoning tasks when the context changes trivially. |
Similar Papers
ICLEval: Evaluating In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on language abilities and knowledge, often overlooking the assessment of ICL ability. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the ICL ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) using the ICLEval benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark demonstrates that ICL ability is universally present in different LLMs and model size is not the sole determinant of ICL efficacy. |
Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act Bayesian (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit the ability to generalize given few-shot examples in their input prompt, an emergent capability known as in-context learning. |
| Approach: | They investigate whether large language models use in-context learning to generalize given few-shot examples in their input prompt. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize given few-shot examples in their input prompt, an emergent capability known as in-context learning. |
No Need for Explanations: LLMs can implicitly learn from mistakes in-context (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature assumes that correct answers to large language models must be accompanied by comprehensive rationales to be helpful. |
| Approach: | They propose to show incorrect answers to Large Language Models (LLMs) as a popular strategy to improve their performance in reasoning-intensive tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms chain-of-thought prompting in math reasoning tasks. |
Are Emergent Abilities in Large Language Models just In-Context Learning? (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have been claimed to acquire certain capabilities without having been specifically trained on them. |
| Approach: | They propose a theory that explains emergent abilities by taking into account their potential confounding factors and rigorously substantiate this theory through over 1000 experiments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed theory proves that emergent abilities are not truly emergental, but result from a combination of in-context learning, model memory, and linguistic knowledge. |
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
How Many Demonstrations Do You Need for In-context Learning? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are capable of complex reasoning when given a few input-output demos. |
| Approach: | They use fewer input-output demos for each test query to study ICL . they do not observe significant degradation when using only one randomly chosen demo . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms multi-demo models on the tasks in 2022. |
Can Many-Shot In-Context Learning Help LLMs as Evaluators? A Preliminary Empirical Study (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation approaches to evaluate Large Language Models are affected by potential biases within LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose two many-shot In-Context Learning (ICL) prompt templates to help LLM evaluators mitigate potential biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed templates reduce biases by using in-context examples with model-generated rationales as references. |
When natural language is not enough: The limits of in-context learning demonstrations in multilingual reasoning (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of reasoning methods in eliciting multi-step reasoned answers from Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging in-context demonstrations. |
| Approach: | They investigate how well CoT and PAL perform across languages for arithmetic and symbolic reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform well in monolingual contexts, primarily in English, but have been limited in other languages. |
Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning have emerged as pre-dominant methodologies for machine learning and NLP. |
| Approach: | They propose to use self-ensembling to improve both performance and calibration of language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning paradigms can achieve better calibration and better performance than the previous learning paradigm. |
The Mystery of In-Context Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Interpretation and Analysis (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) is a capability that enables large language models to excel in proficiency through demonstration examples. |
| Approach: | They present a survey on the interpretation and analysis of in-context learning . they focus on theoretical and empirical perspectives on the concept . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform tasks with minimal examples without re-training and has demonstrated proficiency across various tasks with a minimal set of task-oriented examples. |