Alexander Bukharin, Shiyang Li, Zhengyang Wang, Jingfeng Yang, Bing Yin, Xian Li, Chao Zhang, Tuo Zhao, Haoming Jiang
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that by curating high quality and diverse instruction tuning datasets, we can significantly improve instruction-following capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm to control diversity and quality of instruction tuning datasets and validate it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm significantly improves worst and average case performance on large scale instruction tuning datasets. |
Similar Papers
Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metric (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuming Yang, Yang Nan, Junjie Ye, Shihan Dou, Xiao Wang, Shuo Li, Huijie Lv, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing studies have explored various diversity-aware data selection methods to construct high-quality datasets and enhance model performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use data diversity to measure instruction tuning of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed diversity metric outperforms existing methods on simulated and real-world data and shows that it captures diversity variations and achieves a 0.97 correlation with instruction tuning. |
From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou, Xueyan Wu, Mu Zhang, Jianxing Yu, Tong Ruan, Jingping Liu
| Challenge: | Existing methods to optimize instruction tuning datasets face two main challenges: unreasonable pruning of potentially valuable low-quality data and the persistence of noise or semantic drift during revision. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated iterative framework for instruction data optimization that prunes low-quality data and refines low quality data using feedback-driven iteration. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods on seven public benchmark datasets with high data efficiency. |
Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yuan Ge, Yilun Liu, Chi Hu, Weibin Meng, Shimin Tao, Xiaofeng Zhao, Mahong Xia, Zhang Li, Boxing Chen, Hao Yang, Bei Li, Tong Xiao, JingBo Zhu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for instruction data selection have limitations such as relying on fragile external APIs, being affected by biases in GPT models, or reducing the diversity of the selected instruction dataset. |
| Approach: | They propose an industrial-friendly, expert-aligned and diversity-preserved instruction data selection method: Clustering and Ranking (CaR). |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms Alpaca's existing methods by 32.1% in GPT-4 evaluations. |
How Do Your Code LLMs perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with Really Good Data (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yejie Wang, Keqing He, Dayuan Fu, Zhuoma GongQue, Heyang Xu, Yanxu Chen, Zhexu Wang, Yujia Fu, Guanting Dong, Muxi Diao, Jingang Wang, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Weiran Xu
| Challenge: | Recent research has shown that code pre-trained models improve coding capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a code data pruning strategy to identify which datasets are high-quality code instruction data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data. |
What Makes Good Instruction-Tuning Data? An In-Context Learning Perspective (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for instruction-tuning data contain redundancy and low-quality samples. |
| Approach: | They propose an instruction data selection framework based on weighted in-context influence . they show that sample difficulty negatively correlates with in-constext influence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines under constrained data budgets while demonstrating that sample difficulty negatively correlates with in-context influence. |
RECOST: External Knowledge Guided Data-efficient Instruction Tuning (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Considering the high computing power overhead, data-efficient instruction tuning is proposed to reduce the training data size. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to improve instruction tuning by integrating external knowledge into a single pipeline. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves better results with only 1% of the full dataset. |
Demystifying Instruction Mixing for Fine-tuning Large Language Models (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning is effective for aligning large language models with human instructions, but the procedure to optimizing the mixing of instruction datasets is still unclear. |
| Approach: | They categorize instructions into three primary types: NLP downstream tasks, coding, and general chat. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance of large language models (LLMs) but it is difficult to combine different instruction datasets to optimize overall performance. |
Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Earlier studies of instruction tuning on Large Language Models focus on creating large, varied, and high-quality datasets with responses curated by human experts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a smaller and weaker model to fine tune a larger and stronger model . they find it can largely speed up the data filtering and improve performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can filter instruction data faster and better on benchmarks. |
Priority on High-Quality: Selecting Instruction Data via Consistency Verification of Noise Injection (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for instruction selection rely on external models or rules, overlooking the intrinsic association between pre-trained model and instruction data. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that utilizes noise injection to identify the quality of instruction data without relying on external models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the model trained on the entire dataset and established baselines. |
MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Fanyi Yang, Jianfeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Haoyu Liu, Xixin Cao, Yuefeng Zhan, Hao Sun, Weiwei Deng, Feng Sun, Qi Zhang
| Challenge: | Instruction tuning has enabled large language models to achieve remarkable performance, yet its success heavily depends on the availability of high-quality instruction-response pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a mutual alignment framework which enforces coherence between instructions and responses through mutual constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generalizes well across model architectures and sizes, achieving state-of-the-art performance on LLaMA, Mistral, and Qwen models across diverse benchmarks. |