| Challenge: | Recent work by Hewitt et al. (2020) provides an interpretation of the empirical success of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) as language models (LMs). |
| Approach: | They generalize their construction and show that RNNs can efficiently represent a larger class of LMs than previously claimed. |
| Outcome: | The results suggest that RNNs can represent a larger class of LMs than previously claimed . |
Similar Papers
Lower Bounds on the Expressivity of Recurrent Neural Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies of the representational capacity of neural LMs have focused on their ability to recognize formal languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to connect recurrent neural networks (RNNs) as classifiers to finite-state automatas (FSAs) and a probabilistic FSA to characterize their representational capacity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can express arbitrary regular LMs with linearly bounded precision. |
The Importance of Being Recurrent for Modeling Hierarchical Structure (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that recurrent neural networks can implicitly capture hierarchical information when trained to solve common natural language processing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a convolutional sequence-to-sequence model that exploits hierarchical information implicitly. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is recurrent and non-recurrent, and it can model hierarchical structure implicitly. |
Recurrent Neural Language Models as Probabilistic Finite-state Automata (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on the expressive power of recurrent neural network LMs to recognize unweighted formal languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to model a strict subset of probabilistic finite-state automata with RNNs . they show that an RNN requires left(N ||right) neurons to represent an LM . |
| Outcome: | The proposed language models can represent a strict subset of probabilistic distributions expressed by finite-state models. |
On the Representational Capacity of Recurrent Neural Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on LMs as formal languages, but they do not consider language membership. |
| Approach: | They extend the Turing completeness result to the probabilistic case . they show that a rationally weighted RLM can simulate any deterministic Turing machine . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can simulate any deterministic Turing machine with rationally weighted transitions . the proposed model is based on recurrent neural networks with a rational weighting over strings . |
RNNs can generate bounded hierarchical languages with optimal memory (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that RNNs can efficiently generate bounded hierarchical languages with high syntactic fidelity, but their success is not well-understood theoretically. |
| Approach: | They propose a language of well-nested brackets and m-bounded nesting depth . they prove that an RNN with O(m log k) hidden units suffices, an exponential reduction in memory, by an explicit construction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed language is well-nested brackets and has m-bounded nesting depth . it shows that an RNN with O(m log k) hidden units suffices, an exponential reduction in memory, by an explicit construction. |
On the Practical Ability of Recurrent Neural Networks to Recognize Hierarchical Languages (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | recurrent models have been effective in NLP tasks but performance on context-free languages (CFLs) is weak. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of recurrent models on Dyck-n languages . they find that they are expressive enough to recognize Dyck words of arbitrary lengths if their depths are bounded. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generalize well on Dyck-n languages, while performing poorly on longer test strings. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Colorless Green Recurrent Networks Dream Hierarchically (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) can induce non-trivial properties of language. |
| Approach: | They investigate whether RNNs can track hierarchical syntactic structure . they include nonsensical sentences where RNN cannot rely on semantic cues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can predict long-distance agreement in nonsensical sentences in Italian and English. |
Computational Expressivity of Neural Language Models (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models (LMs) are at the forefront of NLP research due to their versatility across diverse tasks. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide a framework for formal analysis of modern language models using tools from formal language theory. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will provide a framework for formal analysis of modern language models using tools from formal language theory (FLT). |
RNN Simulations of Grammaticality Judgments on Long-distance Dependencies (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LSTM networks can detect linguistic structures which are ungrammatical due to extraction violations, but are sensitive to linguistic processing factors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LSTM networks to detect ungrammatical sentences by detecting extra arguments and subject-relative clause island violations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can correctly classify (un)grammatical sentences, in certain conditions, but is sensitive to linguistic processing factors and unable to induce a more abstract notion of grammaticality. |