| Challenge: | Recent advances in LLMs have demonstrated significant capabilities in many applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for FActScore on texts generated by strong multilingual LLMs and evaluate their performance in other languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that LLMs exhibit distinct behaviors in fact extraction and fact scoring tasks. |
Similar Papers
Factuality of Large Language Models: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxia Wang, Minghan Wang, Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Fei Liu, Georgi Georgiev, Rocktim Das, Preslav Nakov
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are factually incorrect, which limits their applicability in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They analyze existing work to identify major challenges and their associated causes . they propose to evaluate LLMs using a variety of measures to mitigate factual errors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on a variety of datasets and proposed strategies to mitigate factual errors. |
Merging Facts, Crafting Fallacies: Evaluating the Contradictory Nature of Aggregated Factual Claims in Long-Form Generations (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing factuality metrics cannot evaluate paragraphs with ambiguous entities, authors show . |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric to evaluate the factuality of long-form generations from large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric can assess the factuality of people biographies with entity ambiguity better than FActScore. |
Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multilingual large language models (LLMs) exhibit factual inconsistencies across languages . authors identify two primary sources of error: insufficient engagement of reliable English-centric mechanism for factual recall, and incorrect translation from English back into the target language for the final answer. |
| Approach: | They propose two vector interventions to redirect the model toward better internal paths for higher factual consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed interventions increase the recall accuracy by over 35 percent for the lowest-performing language. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettlemoyer, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
| Challenge: | Evaluating the factuality of long-form text generated by large language models (LMs) is non-trivial because (1) generations often contain a mixture of supported and unsupported pieces of information, making binary judgments of quality inadequate and (2) human evaluation is time-consuming and costly. |
| Approach: | They introduce a new evaluation that breaks a generation into a series of atomic facts and computes the percentage of atom facts supported by a reliable knowledge source. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model breaks a generation into atomic facts and computes the percentage of atomic fact supported by a reliable knowledge source. |
VeriScore: Evaluating the factuality of verifiable claims in long-form text generation (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing metrics for evaluating the factuality of long-form text assume that every claim is verifiable. |
| Approach: | They propose a metric to evaluate factuality in diverse long-form generation tasks . they use open-weight language models to extract verifiable and unverifiably content . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric can be implemented with either closed or fine-tuned open-weight language models. |
Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Dor Muhlgay, Ori Ram, Inbal Magar, Yoav Levine, Nir Ratner, Yonatan Belinkov, Omri Abend, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Amnon Shashua, Yoav Shoham
| Challenge: | Existing methods for factuality evaluation of LLM generation focus on facts sampled from the LM itself and might under-represent domain specific or rare facts. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that transforms a factual corpus into a benchmark evaluating an LM's propensity to generate true facts from the corpus . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework transforms a factual corpus of interest into a benchmark evaluating an LM's propensity to generate true facts from the corpus vs. similar but incorrect statements. |
X-FACTR: Multilingual Factual Knowledge Retrieval from Pretrained Language Models (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language models (LMs) capture factual knowledge by filling in the blanks of cloze-style prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a code-switching-based method to improve the ability of multilingual LMs to access knowledge and verify its effectiveness on several benchmark languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the ability of multilingual LMs to access knowledge and verify its effectiveness on several benchmark languages. |
GuideQ: Framework for Guided Questioning for progressive informational collection and classification (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a new multilingual dataset, we examine how LLMs can be used to represent factual knowledge across languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a methodology to measure the extent of representation sharing across languages by repurposing knowledge editing methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can answer a question consistently across languages and can store the answers in a shared representation for several languages. |
Is It Good Data for Multilingual Instruction Tuning or Just Bad Multilingual Evaluation for Large Language Models? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing practices of fine-tuning and evaluating multilingual large language models may not align with this objective due to a heavy reliance on translation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use translated or native instruction data to fine-tune multilingual large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be fine tuned and evaluated in multilingual large language models . the results show that native or translated data can be used to compare model performance . |