QUITE: Quantifying Uncertainty in Natural Language Text in Bayesian Reasoning Scenarios (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing probabilistic reasoning datasets require the model to only rank textual alternatives or use limited set of templates. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-answering dataset that uses probabilistic rules to express degrees of certainty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on all reasoning types . it is available on Github and is expected to be used in clinical documentation . |
Similar Papers
Quantifying Uncertainty in Natural Language Explanations of Large Language Models for Question Answering (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities, enabling concise, context-aware answers in question answering tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that provides valid uncertainty guarantees for LLMs . they also propose 'model-agnostic' uncertainty estimation method that maintains valid guarantees even under noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method provides valid uncertainty guarantees even under noise. |
What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoning (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Akshay Paruchuri, Jake Garrison, Shun Liao, John Hernandez, Jacob Sunshine, Tim Althoff, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff
| Challenge: | Language models (LMs) are capable of remarkably complex linguistic tasks, but numerical reasoning is an area in which they struggle. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of language models using idealized and real-world statistical distributions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can make inferences about distributions, even if assumptions are incorrect or misspecified. |
Deal, or no deal (or who knows)? Forecasting Uncertainty in Conversations using Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Effective interlocutors account for the uncertain goals, beliefs, and emotions of others. |
| Approach: | They propose to calibrate language models to better represent outcome uncertainty . they propose to use two methods to calibrated small open-source models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed fine-tuning strategies can calibrate smaller open-source models to beat pre-trained models 10x their size. |
Perceptions of Linguistic Uncertainty by Language Models and Humans (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that humans are well-attuned to the use of uncertainty expressions, exhibiting population-level agreement in mapping these expressions to numerical responses. |
| Approach: | They propose to map linguistic expressions of uncertainty to numerical responses by using a theory of mind approach to understand the uncertainty of another agent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can map expressions to probabilistic responses in a human-like manner, but different behavior depending on whether a statement is actually true or false. |
Uncertainty in Language Models: Assessment through Rank-Calibration (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xinmeng Huang, Shuo Li, Mengxin Yu, Matteo Sesia, Hamed Hassani, Insup Lee, Osbert Bastani, Edgar Dobriban
| Challenge: | Language Models (LMs) have shown promising performance in natural language generation . however, it is crucial to correctly quantify their level of uncertainty in responding to inputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to quantify uncertainty and confidence for Large Language Models . they use a Rank-calibration framework to measure uncertainty and confident responses . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses uncertainty and confidence measures for LMs. |
Reasoning about Ambiguous Definite Descriptions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing resources to evaluate reasoning are not well suited to investigate the capability of resolving ambiguities by explicit reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use ambiguous definite descriptions to create a benchmark dataset which requires models to resolve ambiguity by explicit reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes all information required to resolve the ambiguity in the prompt, which means a model does not require anything but reasoning to do well. |
Not quite Sherlock Holmes: Language model predictions do not reliably differentiate impossible from improbable events (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work has shown that language models can select the most likely or plausible of a set of possible events, but they are far from robust. |
| Approach: | They focus on whether language models can select the most likely or plausible of a set of possibilities and compare them to a broader behavior that humans exhibit largely unconsciously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform worse than expected under certain conditions, compared with Llama 3, Gemma 2, and Mistral NeMo, and they are significantly more sensible than leaves. |
Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models (2025.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) produce hallucinations, which undermine user trust and reliability. |
| Approach: | This tutorial offers the first systematic introduction to uncertainty quantification (UQ) for LLMs in text generation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides tools for communicating the reliability of a model answer. |
Deep Bayesian Natural Language Processing (P19-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Introduction to deep Bayesian learning for natural language addresses the fundamentals of statistical models and neural networks. |
| Approach: | This tutorial addresses the advances in deep Bayesian learning for natural language . it focuses on advanced Bayessian models and deep models . authors present case studies and domain applications to tackle different issues . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial focuses on advanced Bayesian models and deep models for natural language . case studies and domain applications are presented to tackle different issues in deep Bayessian processing, learning and understanding. |
MAQA: Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs Regarding Data Uncertainty (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite advances in large language models, they still produce false but incorrect responses. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark for large language models that requires more than two unambiguous answers . they also assess 5 different uncertainty quantification methods in the presence of data uncertainty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method fails in multi-answer question answering tasks compared to single-answered questions . entropy- and consistency-based methods effectively estimate model uncertainty, the authors show . |