Leveraging fine-tuned Large Language Models with LoRA for Effective Claim, Claimer, and Claim Object Detection (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on identifying claims has focused on sentence level, neglecting supplementary attributes such as the claimer and claim object of the claim. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach to detect claims using large language models in natural language understanding and text generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach transforms claim, claimer and claim object detection task into QA setting. |
Similar Papers
Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey (2026.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent election cycles have seen a large number of false information spread across social media and news platforms. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for automated claim verification using Large Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks are based on large-scale models and new methods such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). |
LESA: Linguistic Encapsulation and Semantic Amalgamation Based Generalised Claim Detection from Online Content (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on claim detection is built on the basis of a 'segregation' of claims across different domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a generalized generalized model that captures syntactic features through part-of-speech and dependency embeddings, as well as contextual features through a fine-tuned language model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines on six claim datasets by an average of 3 claim-F1 points and 2 claim-f1 points on the general-domain experiments. |
Can LLMs Clarify? Investigation and Enhancement of Large Language Models on Argument Claim Optimization (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in text rewriting tasks such as style transfer and query rewrite, their application to claim optimization remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a sliding window mechanism to evaluate the performance of large language models in claim clarification tasks under different settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the performance of three LLMs on the claim clarification task under zero-shot, few-shot and supervised fine-tuning settings. |
IMHO Fine-Tuning Improves Claim Detection (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results show that using this approach improves the state of art performance across four benchmark argumentation data sets by an average of 4 absolute F1 points in claim detection. |
| Approach: | They propose to fine-tune a language model using a Reddit corpus of opinionated claims and use the internet acronyms IMO/IMHO to identify claims. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves state of art performance across four benchmark argumentation data sets by an average of 4 absolute F1 points. |
A Zero-Shot Claim Detection Framework Using Question Answering (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing claims detection frameworks are portability to emerging events and low-resource training data settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a claim detection framework that leverages zero-shot Question Answering to solve sub-tasks such as topic filtering, claim object detection, and claimer detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines on the NewsClaims benchmark. |
Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claims (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lack of a standardized evaluation framework impedes assessment and comparison of claim extraction methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating claim extraction in the context of fact-checking . they also introduce Claimify, an LLM-based claim extraction method . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework outperforms existing methods in the evaluation of claim extraction methods. |
LLMTaxo: Leveraging Large Language Models for Constructing Taxonomy of Factual Claims from Social Media (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Social media's global reach and ease of use have transformed how millions of users exchange opinions, news, and factual claims in real-time, making it fertile ground for misinformation. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages large language models to construct taxonomies of factual claims from social media by generating topics at multiple levels of granularity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework produces clear, coherent, and comprehensive taxonomies on three diverse datasets and outperforms other frameworks in most metrics. |
Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generative large language models (LLMs) incorporate external references to generate and support claims. however, evaluating the attribution remains an open problem. |
| Approach: | They investigate automatic evaluation of attribution given by large language models . they define different types of attributed errors and then explore two approaches . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods highlight promising signals and challenges. |
Can Large Language Models Generate High-quality Patent Claims? (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional performance across various text generation tasks, but remain under-explored in the patent domain, which offers highly structured and precise language. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset to investigate the performance of current LLMs in patent claim generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art general LLMs in patent claim generation. |
Triple-R: Automatic Reasoning for Fact Verification Using Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fact-checking lack external sources and human-understandable explanations for decision-making . existing methods lack external knowledge sources and explanations . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses the Web as an external knowledge source to retrieve relevant evidence for claims and generates reasons based on the retrieved evidence for datasets lacking explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the transparency and interpretability of fact-checking systems by providing human-understandable explanations for decision-making processes. |