ArchCode: Incorporating Software Requirements in Code Generation with Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the critical role of software requirements, these criteria have not been studied actively in previous code generation works. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages in-context learning to organize and extrapolate unexpressed requirements from textual descriptions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates functional requirements from textual descriptions and extrapolates unexpressed requirements from them. |
Similar Papers
ConCodeEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Constraints in Domain-Specific Languages (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Mehant Kammakomati, Sameer Pimparkhede, Srikanth G. Tamilselvam, Prince Kumar, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in code generation and natural language understanding, but they struggle with code constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models to handle constraints represented in code . they use JSON, YAML, XML, Python, and natural language to test their effectiveness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that LLMs can handle code constraints better than natural language . the results suggest that conscious choice of representations can lead to optimal use of LLM in enterprise use cases involving code constraints. |
CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CodeIF assesses the ability of large language models to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks across a wide range of complexity levels and programming domains. |
ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hanxing Ding, Shuchang Tao, Liang Pang, Zihao Wei, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to tool learning rely on hand-crafted prompts and natural language reasoning, making multi-step planning difficult and lacking precise error diagnosis and reflection mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves superior performance in task completion accuracy and execution reliability compared to existing approaches. |
Evaluating In-Context Learning of Libraries for Code Generation (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that large proprietary LLMs can learn novel library usage in-context from demonstrations. |
| Approach: | They evaluate large proprietary LLMs to understand library usage in-context . they find they are able to generate code based on library specification presented in-constext - a promising area . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can learn library usage in-context from demonstrations . the results pave the way for more adaptable and dynamic coding environments. |
DocCGen: Document-based Controlled Code Generation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sameer Pimparkhede, Mehant Kammakomati, Srikanth Tamilselvam, Prince Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) produce state-of-the-art performance on natural language to code generation for resource-rich general-purpose languages like C++, Java, and Python. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that breaks the NL-to-Code generation task into two steps . they use library documentation to detect the correct libraries and schema rules extracted from the documentation to constrain the decoding . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves different sized language models across all six evaluation metrics, reducing syntactic and semantic errors in structured code. |
XCodeEval: An Execution-based Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have shown impressive abilities in generating codes from natural language descriptions, repairing buggy codes, translating codes between languages, and retrieving relevant code segments. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual multitask benchmark to evaluate large language models that can generate codes from natural language descriptions, repair buggy codes, and translate between languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs 7 tasks covering up to 11 languages with execution-level parallelism and 25 M document-level coding examples (16.5 B tokens) |
Flow2Code: Evaluating Large Language Models for Flowchart-based Code Generation Capability (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing code generation benchmarks neglect flowchart-based code generation . existing benchmarks lack flowcharting-based evaluation, limiting the potential of large language models and minimizing human error. |
| Approach: | They propose to use flowcharts to evaluate existing LLMs' code generation capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the supervised fine-tuning technique contributes greatly to the models’ performance. |
Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Survey (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Daoguang Zan, Bei Chen, Fengji Zhang, Dianjie Lu, Bingchao Wu, Bei Guan, Wang Yongji, Jian-Guang Lou
| Challenge: | generating code from a natural language description is a pressing and significant challenge in code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to survey 27 existing large language models for NL2Code and compare them to humanEval benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with existing models on the HumanEval benchmark. |
mHumanEval - A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current evaluations focus on English-to-Python conversion tasks with limited test cases . code generation from low-resource language prompts remains largely unexplored . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that supports prompts in over 200 natural languages . they provide expert human translations for 15 diverse natural languages (NLs) |
| Outcome: | The HumanEval Benchmark is the most widely used code generation benchmark . it provides expert human translations for 15 diverse natural languages . |
The Program Testing Ability of Large Language Models for Code (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent development of large language models (LLMs) for code shows promise in achieving code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They explore the ability of large language models to generate automated test cases . they show +11.77% and +4.22% higher code pass rates on HumanEval+ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show higher pass rates on humanEval+ compared with the current state-of-the-art models. |