Mengru Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Ziwen Xu, Zekun Xi, Shumin Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Qishen Zhang, Linyi Yang, Jindong Wang, Huajun Chen
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detoxify Large Language Models (LLMs) are limiting, but knowledge editing can be effective. |
| Approach: | They propose a baseline method to detoxify Large Language Models (LLMs) they propose supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces toxicity of large language models with one instance of tuning . it reduces the toxicity, while minimizing the toxins, the authors show . |
Similar Papers
Adaptive Detoxification: Safeguarding General Capabilities of LLMs through Toxicity-Aware Knowledge Editing (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yifan Lu, Jing Li, Yigeng Zhou, Yihui Zhang, Wenya Wang, Xiucheng Li, Meishan Zhang, Fangming Liu, Jun Yu, Min Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods for large language models (LLMs) suffer from over-editing, where detoxified models reject legitimate queries, compromising overall performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a toxicity-aware knowledge editing approach that dynamically detects toxic activation patterns during forward propagation and then routes computations through adaptive inter-layer pathways to mitigate toxicity effectively. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on large language models and enhances the SafeEdit benchmark. |
Model Surgery: Modulating LLM’s Behavior Via Simple Parameter Editing (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches for detoxification or preventing jailbreaking involve fine-tuning billions of parameters through gradient descent with substantial computational cost. |
| Approach: | They propose to use supervised fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from human feedback to modify LLMs' behavior by directly editing a small subset of parameters. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that editing a small subset of parameters can modulate specific behaviors of LLMs, such as detoxification and resistance to jailbreak, with only inference-level computational resources. |
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are not immune to issues of factual accuracy or logically consistent. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will present cutting-edge methods and practical tools for editing Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The aim of this course is to familiarize researchers with the latest advancements and emerging strategies in the realm of knowledge editing for LLMs. |
A Survey of Toxicity Mitigation Strategies for Multilingual Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models can reproduce and amplify toxic content, including hate speech, harassment, and bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive survey of the many detoxification methods tailored to multilingual LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on data filtering, style transfer, expert-based logit steering, retrieval augmentation, and human feedback. |
Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge editing is a promising technique for updating factual knowledge in large language models (LLMs) but studies have identified side effects such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities that have emerged after editing. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the side effects of knowledge editing in large language models using metrics and benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The results of the study highlight the limitations of current knowledge editing methods and outline potential research directions. |
MICo: Preventative Detoxification of Large Language Models through Inhibition Control (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Roy Siegelmann, Ninareh Mehrabi, Palash Goyal, Prasoon Goyal, Lisa Bauer, Jwala Dhamala, Aram Galstyan, Rahul Gupta, Reza Ghanadan
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have a tendency to devolve into toxic degeneration . model may classify prompts as toxic or non-toxic and categorically refuse to respond to those deemed toxic. |
| Approach: | They propose a mechanism for LLM detoxification by labeling acceptable and unacceptable examples and including a corresponding acceptable rewrite with every unacceptable example. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the baseline model and shows that it detects and rewrites toxic and harmful examples. |
Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in model editing for LLMs have created challenges and opportunities for the community. |
| Approach: | They propose to alter the behavior of LLMs efficiently within a specific domain without negatively impacting performance across other inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method alters behavior of LLMs efficiently within a specific domain without negatively impacting performance across other inputs. |
Detoxifying Large Language Models via the Diversity of Toxic Samples (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for analyzing and utilizing toxic samples are limited . current methods fail to fully harness their potential . |
| Approach: | They propose a diverse detoxification framework that leverages toxic samples' diversity . they propose MPSG strategy and SC-DPO approach to elicit personalized toxic responses . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework could be used to optimize large language models for user safety . it incorporates two components: MPSG strategy and SC-DPO approach . |
Detoxification for LLM: From Dataset Itself (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for large language models focus on post-training stage or inference time, while few tackle the source of toxicity, namely, the dataset itself. |
| Approach: | They propose to localize and rewrite toxic spans in raw corpora with SoCD, which guides an LLM to localized and preserving semantics while preserving toxicity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces TP from 0.42 to 0.18 and Expected Maximum Toxicity (EMT) from 0.43 to 0.20 on three LLMs. |
Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Johannes Welbl, Amelia Glaese, Jonathan Uesato, Sumanth Dathathri, John Mellor, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Kirsty Anderson, Pushmeet Kohli, Ben Coppin, Po-Sen Huang
| Challenge: | Prior work often relies on automatic evaluation of LM toxicity. |
| Approach: | They evaluate toxicity mitigation strategies for automated and human evaluations . they find human raters disagree with high automatic toxicity scores after strong toxicity reduction interventions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods reduce LM toxicity but lower coverage for marginalized texts . human raters disagree with high toxicity scores after strong toxicity reduction interventions . |