Factual Relation Discrimination for Factuality-oriented Abstractive Summarization (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing factuality-oriented abstractive summarization models only consider the integration of factual information and ignore the causes of factuual errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a factuality-oriented abstractive summarization model that can identify the causes of factual errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models in factual metrics. |
Similar Papers
Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarization (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent abstractive summarization systems produce factual errors that are not faithful to the input . current methods are lacking in identifying what errors are most important to target . |
| Approach: | They use synthetic and human-labeled data to identify factual errors in summarization and train models on the factuality detection task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model detects factual errors on word, dependency, and sentence levels. |
Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infilling (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often generate inconsistent summaries containing factual errors or fabricated content. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate representative examples of non-factual summaries through infilling language models and train a robust fact-correction model to post-edit them to improve factual consistency. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms previous methods in correcting factual errors on two popular summarization datasets. |
Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization without Sacrificing Summary Quality (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that most abstractive summarization models are unfaithful and suffer from a wide range of hallucination. |
| Approach: | They propose a candidate summary generation and ranking technique to improve summary factuality without sacrificing quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that the model trained using the proposed method improves on factuality and similarity-based metrics without conflicting with the model. |
Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern summarization models generate fluent but often factually unreliable outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use human annotations to identify different categories of factual errors and benchmark factuality metrics to improve summarization evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method identifies the proportion of different categories of factual errors and benchmarks their human judgements as well as their specific strengths and weaknesses. |
Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art abstractive summarization systems often generate hallucinations, i.e., content that is not directly inferable from the source document. |
| Approach: | They propose a detection approach that separates factual from non-factual hallucinations of entities by masked language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines in accuracy and F1 scores and has a strong correlation with human judgments on factuality classification tasks. |
CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating abstractive summarization are inconsistent and rely on heuristically created data for error handling. |
| Approach: | They propose a contrastive learning formulation that leverages both positive and negative summaries to train summarization systems that are better at distinguishing between them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning framework produces more factual summaries than strong comparisons with post error correction, entailment-based reranking, and unlikelihood training. |
Gradient-Based Adversarial Factual Consistency Evaluation for Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often produce inconsistent statements or false facts. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient weak-supervised adversarial data augmentation approach to generate factual consistency datasets by backpropagating gradients on token embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can make interpretable factual errors tracing on public datasets and is cost-effective. |
On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing conditional text generation models produce unfaithful and unfaithed summaries . current models accomplish a high level of fluency and coherence . |
| Approach: | They propose to use pretrained models for document summarization to better understand hallucinations . they find that textual entailment measures better correlate with faithfulness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generate faithful and factual summaries as evaluated by humans. |
Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often distort or fabricate facts in articles . factual inconsistency is a common problem with abstractive summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a fact-aware summarization model FASum to extract factual relations into the summary generation process via graph attention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can produce abstractive summaries with higher factual consistency compared with existing systems and corrects factual errors via modifying only a few keywords. |
Evaluating the Tradeoff Between Abstractiveness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models generate fluent and well-formed output but lack semantic faithfulness, or factuality, with respect to the input documents. |
| Approach: | They propose new factuality metrics that adjust for the degree of abstractiveness . they propose to visualize the rates of change in factual as we gradually increase abstractiveity . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generate fluent and well-formed summaries but lack semantic faithfulness, or factuality, with respect to the input documents. |