FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactions (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations for theory of mind (ToM) use passive narratives that lack interactivity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to stress-test ToM within information-asymmetric conversational contexts via question answering. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is challenging for state-of-the-art language models, which perform significantly worse than humans even with chain-of thought reasoning or fine-tuning. |
Similar Papers
NegotiationToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind on Negotiation Surrounding (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chunkit Chan, Cheng Jiayang, Yauwai Yim, Zheye Deng, Wei Fan, Haoran Li, Xin Liu, Hongming Zhang, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Theory of mind evaluations currently focus on testing models using machine-generated data or game settings prone to shortcuts and spurious correlations. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to stress-test machine ToM in real-world negotiation surrounding covered multi-dimensional mental states. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark builds upon the Belief-Desire-Intention theory and conducts the necessary empirical experiments to evaluate large language models. |
OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing N-ToM benchmarks lack ambiguous and artificial narratives, lack of personality traits and preferences, and limited diversity in the questions posed. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) with longer and clearer narrative stories, characters with explicit personality traits, actions triggered by character intentions, and questions designed to challenge LLMs’ abilities of modeling characters’ mental states. |
| Outcome: | The proposed test aims to assess the performance of LLMs in the physical and psychological worlds. |
ToM-SSI: Evaluating Theory of Mind in Situated Social Interactions (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Theory of Mind (ToM) benchmarks focus on text-only or dyadic interactions, but to address this gap, we propose ToM-SSI: a new benchmark specifically designed to test ToM capabilities in environments rich with social interactions and spatial dynamics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Sally-Anne test to test ToM capabilities in environments rich in social interactions and spatial dynamics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model captures a wider range of social cognition than existing models and demonstrates that existing models are still limited in these new tasks. |
Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Natalie Shapira, Mosh Levy, Seyed Hossein Alavi, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, Yoav Goldberg, Maarten Sap, Vered Shwartz
| Challenge: | Recent work suggests that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) however, prior work reached conflicting conclusions regarding those abilities. |
| Approach: | They examine the extent of Large Language Models’ N-ToM abilities through an extensive evaluation of 6 tasks and find that LLMs struggle with adversarial examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics show that LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, but this behavior is far from robust. |
Views Are My Own, but Also Yours: Benchmarking Theory of Mind Using Common Ground (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Adil Soubki, John Murzaku, Arash Yousefi Jordehi, Peter Zeng, Magdalena Markowska, Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel, Owen Rambow
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for theory of mind (ToM) use synthetic data, which can misalign with human behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-answer benchmark based on naturally occurring spoken dialogs to evaluate theory of mind capabilities of language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that LMs struggle to demonstrate theory of mind (ToM) . |
Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and Enhancement (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Theory of Mind (ToM) is a cornerstone of human social intelligence . Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into daily life . |
| Approach: | They analyze evaluation benchmarks and enhancement strategies to evaluate LLMs' ToM capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed and widely used story-based benchmarks and enhancement strategies are used to evaluate LLMs' ToM capabilities. |
XToM: Exploring the Multilingual Theory of Mind for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chunkit Chan, Yauwai Yim, Hongchuan Zeng, Zhiying Zou, Xinyuan Cheng, Zhifan Sun, Zheye Deng, Kawai Chung, Yuzhuo Ao, Fan Yixiang, Cheng Jiayang, Ercong Nie, Ginny Wong, Helmut Schmid, Hinrich Schuetze, Simon See, Yangqiu Song
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of ToM in LLMs are limited to English, neglecting the linguistic diversity that shapes human cognition. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual benchmark that evaluates ToM across five languages . they find that models excel in multilingual language understanding, but their ToM performance varies across languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs across five languages and incorporates diverse task scenarios. |
Does Theory of Mind Improvement Really Benefit Human-AI Interactions? Empirical Findings from Interactive Evaluations (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks measure ToM capability improvement through story-reading, multiple-choice questions from a third-person perspective, while ignoring the first-person, dynamic nature of human-AI interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a new paradigm of interactive ToM evaluation with both perspective and metric shifts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the performance of four representative LLM enhancement techniques using real-world datasets and a user study. |
Hi-ToM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Higher-Order Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to reason about one's own and others' mental states. |
| Approach: | They propose a higher-order theory of mind benchmark and introduce a new deception mechanism to evaluate ToM reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the LLMs are not performing well on higher-order tasks. |
Minding Language Models’ (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results show plug-and-play approach to reason about belief states of multiple characters in reading comprehension tasks is more precise and interpretable than previous approaches. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play approach to reason about the belief states of multiple characters in reading comprehension tasks via explicit symbolic representation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm improves theory of mind of off-the-shelf neural language models without supervision. |