Challenge: Recent work has focused on natural logic, which operates directly on natural language by capturing the semantic relation of spans between an aligned claim and its evidence via set-theoretic operators.
Approach: They propose to use question answering to predict natural logic operators using generalization capabilities of instruction-tuned language models.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms the best baseline on a Danish verification dataset by 4.3 accuracy points.

Similar Papers

ProoFVer: Natural Logic Theorem Proving for Fact Verification (2022.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent fact verification systems rely on neural network classifiers for veracity prediction, which lack explainability.
Approach: They propose a model that generates natural logic-based inferences as proofs using lexical mutations between spans in the claim and the evidence retrieved.
Outcome: The proposed model has highest label accuracy and second best score in the FEVER leaderboard.
Can NLI Models Verify QA Systems’ Predictions? (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent question answering systems perform well on benchmark datasets, but are not always well-calibrated to spot spurious answers under distribution shifts.
Approach: They propose to use natural language inference to verify whether answers are correct . they leverage large pre-trained models and recent prior datasets to construct powerful question conversion and decontextualization modules.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves the confidence estimation of a QA model across different domains, evaluated in a selective QA setting.
Zero-Shot Fact Verification via Natural Logic and Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advancements in fact verification systems with natural logic have enhanced their explainability by aligning claims with evidence through set-theoretic operators, providing faithful justifications.
Approach: They propose a method that utilizes the generalization capabilities of instruction-tuned large language models to provide faithful justifications.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms other systems that were not specifically trained on natural logic data, and achieves an average accuracy improvement of 8.96 points over the baseline.
Complex Reasoning in Natural Language (2023.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research shows that pretrained language models are often brittle for complex reasoning tasks.
Approach: They propose to use pre-trained language models to teach machines to reason over texts . they will review recent promising approaches to tackling complex reasoning tasks .
Outcome: This tutorial reviews promising approaches to complex reasoning tasks . it reviews the methods that can be used to augment models with robustness .
Automated Fact-Checking in Dialogue: Are Specialized Models Needed? (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work has shown that typical fact-checking models struggle with claims made in conversation.
Approach: They propose to fine-tune models for dialogue on conversational data to improve performance on typical fact-checking.
Outcome: The proposed models perform better on stand-alone claims than state-of-the-art models for dialogue while maintaining their performance on standalone claim.
Neural Natural Logic Inference for Interpretable Question Answering (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question answering models are based on textual entailment tasks . prior work has focused on QA on premise-based questions .
Approach: They propose a neural-symbolic QA approach that integrates natural logic reasoning within deep learning architectures towards developing effective question answering models.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms previous work on multiple-choice science questions . it integrates natural logic reasoning within deep learning architectures to build proof paths .
QaDialMoE: Question-answering Dialogue based Fact Verification with Mixture of Experts (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing research on fact verification focuses on news, tables and Wikipedia passages.
Approach: They propose a question-answering dialogue based fact verification with mixture of experts that exploits questions and evidence effectively in the verification process.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms previous approaches on three benchmark datasets and achieves state-of-the-art results.
A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking (2022.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Fact-checking is an essential task in journalism due to the speed with which information and misinformation can spread in the media ecosystem.
Approach: They propose to use natural language processing to automate fact-checking by identifying common concepts and defining definitions.
Outcome: The proposed method can predict the veracity of claims using natural language processing, machine learning, and databases.
Using contradictions improves question answering systems (2023.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing systems that use contradiction to determine if a question is supported by background contexts do better than those that use entailment.
Approach: They propose a method that incorporates contradiction in natural language inference (NLI) they propose to reformulate answers from QA systems as hypotheses and then select the best one based on the results.
Outcome: The proposed method improves on multiple choice and extractive QA in two settings.
Logic-Guided Data Augmentation and Regularization for Consistent Question Answering (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have focused on improving the consistency of comparison questions . current models show inconsistent comparison predictions due to small datasets .
Approach: They propose a method that integrates logic rules and neural models to improve the accuracy of comparison questions by enhancing labeled training data.
Outcome: The proposed method improves state-of-the-art models on WIQA and QuaRel and reduces consistency violations by 58% on HotpotQA.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations