Challenge: Dissimilarity measures measure the extent to which two model’s internal representations differ . they can identify and locate generalization properties of models that are invisible via in-distribution test set performance.
Approach: They propose to use representation dissimilarity measures to measure the extent to which two model’s internal representations differ.
Outcome: The proposed dissimilarity measures can identify and locate generalization properties of models that are invisible via in-distribution test set performance and new evaluations of how language model features vary as width and depth are increased.

Similar Papers

Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations.
Approach: They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax.
Outcome: The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs.
How Do Language Models Acquire Character-Level Information? (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models (LMs) implicitly encode character-level information, despite not being explicitly provided during training.
Approach: They analyze how language models acquire character-level knowledge by comparing them to standard settings.
Outcome: The results show that LMs do not treat words as opaque tokens, but instead treat them as tokens.
A Measure-Theoretic Characterization of Tight Language Models (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language modeling is a core task in natural language processing.
Approach: They propose to characterize leakage onto the set of infinite sequences by a measure-theoretic approach.
Outcome: The proposed language model families are tight, meaning they will not leak . the proposed language models are based on the 'sequence leakage' hypothesis .
Brittle Minds, Fixable Activations: Understanding Belief Representations in Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite growing interest in Theory of Mind (ToM) tasks for evaluating language models, little is known about how LMs internally represent mental states of self and others.
Approach: They propose to investigate how LMs internally represent mental states of self and others .
Outcome: The proposed model size and finetuning significantly improve LMs’ internal representations of others’ beliefs, which are structured - not mere by-products of spurious correlations - yet brittle to prompt variations.
Feature Interactions Reveal Linguistic Structure in Language Models (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing features attribution methods for post-hoc interpretability ignore the existence of interactions between the effects of features on the prediction.
Approach: They propose a grey box method to train models to perfection on a formal language classification task using PCFGs.
Outcome: The proposed methods are able to uncover the grammatical rules acquired by the model under specific configurations and provide novel insights into the linguistic structure of the target models.
Similarity Analysis of Contextual Word Representation Models (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing and novel similarity measures are used to analyze contextual word representations . different architectures have rather similar representations, but different individual neurons.
Approach: They propose a method to analyze contextual word representation models using similarity analysis.
Outcome: The proposed approach can be used to analyze model similarity without external annotations.
Understanding Cross-Lingual Alignment—A Survey (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Cross-lingual alignment is the meaningful similarity of representations across languages in multilingual language models.
Approach: They propose a taxonomy of methods to improve cross-lingual alignment . they argue that an effective trade-off between language-neutral and language-specific information is key .
Outcome: The proposed methods can be applied to encoder models and encoder-decoder-only models . they show that language-neutral and language-specific information is key .
A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can disentangle complex features into more interpretable components.
Approach: They propose to use Sparse Autoencoders to disentangle LLM features into more interpretable components.
Outcome: The proposed method disentangles complex features into more interpretable components.
On Entity Identification in Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work has shed light on the internal mechanisms of language models that can recall factual knowledge composed of entities and relations.
Approach: They propose a framework analogous to clustering quality metrics to analyze the correspondence between entities and their mentions.
Outcome: The proposed framework is analogous to clustering quality metrics.
Language Models Understand Us, Poorly (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent large language models have achieved impressive results on benchmark tasks.
Approach: They examine three views of human language understanding: as-mapping, as-reliability and as-representation.
Outcome: The authors argue that language models are inadequate and that they can't understand us . they also argue that as-representation advances a science of understanding .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations