| Challenge: | a standard probabilistic model for language generation has likely not yet learnt many semantic or syntactic rules of natural language, making it difficult to estimate the probability distribution over next tokens. |
| Approach: | They propose to initialise bias terms in a model's final linear layer with the log-unigram distribution and use it to output the unigram frequency statistics as prior knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves learning efficiency and improves overall performance. |
Similar Papers
Do Neural Language Models Overcome Reporting Bias? (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that pre-trained language models can overcome reporting bias by estimating the plausibility of rare but unspoken facts. |
| Approach: | They revisit the experiments conducted by Gordon and Van Durme (2013) . they find that pre-trained language models overestimate the very rare . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach overestimates the rare at the expense of the rare, while minimizing reporting bias. |
End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corpora (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that strong natural language understanding models are prone to relying on unwanted dataset biases without learning the underlying task. |
| Approach: | They propose two learning strategies to train neural models that are more robust to dataset biases and transfer better to out-of-domain datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve robustness in all settings and transfer better to out-of-domain datasets. |
Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overview (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a growing number of studies address the effect of bias on predictions, but no unifying framework exists . a general phenomenon of biased predictive models in NLP is not recent, authors say . |
| Approach: | They propose a unifying framework for identifying and reducing bias in natural language processing . they propose to differentiate two consequences of bias and four potential origins of bias . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework provides an overview of predictive bias in natural language processing . it differentiates two consequences of bias and four potential origins of bias: label bias, selection bias, model overamplification, and semantic bias. |
Quantifying Bias from Decoding Techniques in Natural Language Generation (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural language generation (NLG) models can propagate social bias towards particular demography. |
| Approach: | They propose to examine whether bias metrics like toxicity and sentiment are impacted by decoding techniques that use stochastic decoding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods reveal the imperative of testing inference time bias and provide evidence on the usefulness of inspecting the entire decoding spectrum. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of natural questions have been asked about the inductive biases of neural networks on core NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | They construct an informative prior for held-out languages on a task of character-level, open-vocabulary language modelling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models with an uninformative prior in both zero-shot and few-shot settings, showing that it is imbued with universal linguistic knowledge. |
Avoiding the Hypothesis-Only Bias in Natural Language Inference via Ensemble Adversarial Training (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural models pick up on annotation artefacts and spurious correlations, resulting in learning sentences that suffer from the same biases. |
| Approach: | They propose to tackle this problem by using adversarial training to reduce the bias in sentence representations by using an ensemble of adversaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach produces more robust models outperforming previous de-biasing efforts when generalised to 12 other NLI datasets. |
MiLe Loss: a New Loss for Mitigating the Bias of Learning Difficulties in Generative Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing generative language models neglect an inherent challenge in text corpus during training, i.e., the imbalance between frequent tokens and infrequent ones. |
| Approach: | They propose a function to mitigate the imbalance between frequent and infrequent tokens . authors propose 'MiLe Loss' function to assess learning difficulty of tokens during training . |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that models with proposed model can improve on downstream benchmarks. |
End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Training (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models incorporate dataset biases leading to strong performance on in-distribution test sets but poor performance on out-of-distortion (OOD) tests. |
| Approach: | They propose a debiasing framework where the shallow representations of the main model are used to derive a bias model and both models are trained simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing approaches on three well-studied NLU tasks while still delivering high in-distribution performance. |
Transparency at the Source: Evaluating and Interpreting Language Models With Access to the True Distribution (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new approach to train, evaluate and interpret neural language models uses artificial, language-like data. |
| Approach: | They propose a setup for training, evaluating and interpreting neural language models that uses artificial, language-like data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a massive probabilistic grammar and a large natural language corpus, and provides complete control over the generative process. |