Annotation-Inspired Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with Auxiliary Discourse Connective Generation (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Discourse connectives are words or phrases that signal the presence of a discourse relation. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that generates discourse connectives between arguments and predicts discourse relations based on the generated connectives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines on three datasets and is highly accurate. |
Similar Papers
Improving Implicit Discourse Relation Classification by Modeling Inter-dependencies of Discourse Units in a Paragraph (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for predicting implicit discourse relations ignore wider paragraph contexts beyond the two discourse units examined for a discourse relation prediction. |
| Approach: | They propose a paragraph-level neural network that models inter-dependencies between discourse units and discourse relation continuity and patterns and predicts a sequence of discourse relations in a sentence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art systems on the benchmark corpus of PDTB. |
Adapting BERT to Implicit Discourse Relation Classification with a Focus on Discourse Connectives (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on the performance of BERT for implicit discourse relation classification have not been conducted. |
| Approach: | They propose to apply BERT to implicit discourse relation classification by performing additional pre-training on text tailored to discourse relations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform previous state-of-the-art models in many tasks. |
Implicit Discourse Relation Classification: We Need to Talk about Evaluation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lack of consistency in preprocessing and evaluation poses challenges to fair comparison of results in literature. |
| Approach: | They propose an improved evaluation protocol for implicit relation classification on PDTB 2.0 . they report strong baseline results from pretrained sentence encoders . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation protocol improves the existing framework and provides strong baseline results. |
A Knowledge-Augmented Neural Network Model for Implicit Discourse Relation Classification (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on implicit discourse relation classification have shown success using feedforward networks and convolutional neural networks. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment input text with external knowledge and context and adopt a neural network model that can effectively handle the augmented text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on implicit discourse relation classification. |
Multi-Label Classification for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior research in discourse relation recognition has treated these instances as separate examples during training, with a gold-standard prediction matching one of the labels considered correct at test time. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple labels to annotate an example when multiple relations are believed to hold simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks don't depress performance for single-label prediction. |
Next Sentence Prediction helps Implicit Discourse Relation Classification within and across Domains (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Discourse relation classification is one of the most difficult tasks in discourse parsing. |
| Approach: | They propose a bidirectional encoder representation from transformer model that encodes a representation of likely next sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art system in 11-way classification by 8% points on the standard PDTB dataset. |
Not Just Classification: Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relation on Joint Modeling of Classification and Generation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods of implicit discourse relation recognition (IDRR) focus on three aspects: enhancing discourse units representation, enhancing semantic interaction, and joint learning with other tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a joint model to recognize the relation label and generate the target sentence containing the meaning of relations simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves the best performance against several state-of-the-art systems on Chinese and English datasets. |
Employing the Correspondence of Relations and Connectives to Identify Implicit Discourse Relations via Label Embeddings (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for implicit discourse relation recognition lack the ability to accurately map connectives into discourse relations. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task learning framework where relations and connectives are simultaneously predicted and leveraged to transfer knowledge between the two prediction tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework yields state-of-the-art performance on several settings of the Penn Discourse Treebank dataset. |
Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities by Instruction Learning and Chain-of-Thoughts for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for implicit discourse relation recognition are based on generative models, but some studies suggest they do not perform as well as generic encoder-only models for NLU tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a classification method that is solely based on generative models and utilize Chain-of-Thoughts to partition the inference process into a sequence of three successive stages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on a natural language understanding task. |
Using active learning to expand training data for implicit discourse relation recognition (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to determine semantic relations between text spans are limited in the field of discourse-level relation recognition. |
| Approach: | They propose to expand the training data set using the corpus of explicitly-related arguments by arbitrarily dropping the overtly presented discourse connectives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model expands the training data set using the corpus of explicitly-related arguments, by arbitrarily dropping the overtly presented discourse connectives. |