Is My Model Using the Right Evidence? Systematic Probes for Examining Evidence-Based Tabular Reasoning (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that claim to reason about evidence should avoid spurious patterns . tabular inputs are well-suited for the study—they admit systematic probes . |
| Approach: | They propose to use tabular data to test whether models can reason about evidence . they show that a RoBERTa-based model fails to reason on the following counts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to reason on tabular data on the following counts . the model is over-sensitive to annotation artifacts and ignores relevant parts of the evidence . |
Similar Papers
Right for the Right Reason: Evidence Extraction for Trustworthy Tabular Reasoning (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that tabular reasoning models use spurious correlations and focus on false evidence or ignore it altogether. |
| Approach: | They propose a task where models need to extract evidence and then inference labels . they crowdsource evidence row labels and develop unsupervised evidence extraction strategies . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baseline models on the inference task using only the automatically extracted evidence as the premise. |
Structural Encoding and Pre-training Matter: Adapting BERT for Table-Based Fact Verification (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on fact verification focuses on unstructured textual evidence, but it is still underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a table-based language model to verify textual statements . they use cell embeddings and numerical information to improve accuracy . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art model on question answering tasks even without modeling numerical information. |
Enhancing Tabular Reasoning with Pattern Exploiting Training (2022.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods based on pre-trained language models have shown superior performance over tabular tasks despite showing inherent problems such as not using the right evidence and inconsistent predictions across inputs. |
| Approach: | They utilize Pattern-Exploiting Training (PET) on pre-trained language models to strengthen tabular reasoning models’ pre-existing knowledge and reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exhibits superior understanding of knowledge facts and tabular reasoning compared to baseline models. |
Incorporating External Knowledge to Enhance Tabular Reasoning (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models struggle with tabular inference due to contextualized embeddings of text. |
| Approach: | They propose easy and effective modifications to how information is presented to a model for tabular inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed modifications significantly improve tabular inference performance on large datasets. |
An Efficient Retrieval-Based Method for Tabular Prediction with LLM (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for tabular prediction rely on extensive pre-training or fine-tuning of LLMs . a retrieval-based approach eliminates the need for training any modules or performing data augmentation . |
| Approach: | They propose a retrieval-based approach that utilizes the powerful capabilities of large language models in representation, comprehension, and inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method exhibits strong predictive performance on tabular prediction task, affirming its practicality and effectiveness. |
How Reliable are Model Diagnostics? (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Contemporary statistical models trade off interpretability and simplicity for powerful parameterizations and inductive biases, enabling impressive performance. |
| Approach: | They examine three recent models and find they are not yet reliable . they also formulate recommendations for practitioners and researchers . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are not as reliable as previously assumed, the authors argue . their findings suggest that they are needed for improving models and training setups . |
ABNIRML: Analyzing the Behavior of Neural IR Models (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained contextualized language models such as BERT and T5 have established a new state-of-the-art for ad-hoc ranking. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for Analyzing the Behavior of Neural IR ModeLs that includes new types of diagnostic probes that allow us to test several characteristics that are not addressed by previous techniques. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework tests writing styles, factuality, sensitivity to paraphrasing and word order, and can be used to identify unintended biases. |
What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing? (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current retrieval-augmented language models are tasked with subjective, contentious, and conflicting queries. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset that pairs controversial queries with real-world evidence documents . they find current models rely heavily on relevance of a website to the query . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset pairs controversial queries with real-world evidence documents that contain different facts, arguments, and answers. |
Towards Interpretable Tabular Reasoning: Enhancing LLM Reasoning on Tabular Data with Pre-Constructed Logic Graph (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Lirong Gao, Zewei Yu, Zhongrui Yin, Qi Zhang, Yuke Zhu, Bo Zheng, Haobo Wang, Junbo Zhao, Gang Chen, Sheng Guo
| Challenge: | Tabular data is used in fields such as finance and healthcare due to its heterogeneity and complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose a Logic-Graph-Enhanced LLM Reasoning framework that integrates the strengths of tree-based models and LLMs to improve their interpretability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms tree-based models and state-of-the-art LLMs on tabular prediction tasks, achieving superior accuracy and interpretability. |
On Commonsense Cues in BERT for Solving Commonsense Tasks (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models can capture syntactic features, semantic information and factual knowledge, but structured commonsense knowledge is not captured well. |
| Approach: | They quantitatively investigate the presence of structural commonsense cues in BERT when solving commonsensense tasks and the importance of such cue for the model prediction. |
| Outcome: | The presence of commonsense knowledge is positively correlated to the model accuracy. |