| Challenge: | Existing methods for learning human values do not consider contextual and abstract nature of human values. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning based method that embeds human values judgements into each step of language generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on human values judgements and shows higher alignment performance. |
Similar Papers
High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Samuel Cahyawijaya, Delong Chen, Yejin Bang, Leila Khalatbari, Bryan Wilie, Ziwei Ji, Etsuko Ishii, Pascale Fung
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to align large language models with human values and preferences are not able to be applied to all tasks and fields. |
| Approach: | They propose a high-dimensional representation of symbolic human value distributions in LLMs that is orthogonal to model architecture and training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed representations are evaluated on 15 open-source and commercial LLMs and are self-supervised from the value-relevant output of 8 LLM models. |
Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, alignment learning requires significant human demonstrations and feedback from proprietary LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that uses synthetic feedback to align large language models to human values without extensive human annotations and proprietary LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models on human-annotated demonstrations in alignment benchmarks. |
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for achieving this alignment involve employing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) Existing approaches involve using RLHF to fine-tune LLMs based on human labels . however, RLRF is susceptible to instability during fine- tuning and presents challenges in implementation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning from human feedback to fine-tune large language models with human preferences to achieve precise control of model behavior. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that RAHF can be used to capture and manipulate representations to align with a broad spectrum of human preferences or values rather than being confined to a single concept or function. |
Can Language Models Reason about Individualistic Human Values and Preferences? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods and evaluation frameworks for achieving pluralistic alignment are limited by the diversity of people, which is pre-specified and coarsely categorized, papering over individuality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset transformed from the influential World Values Survey to study language models on the specific challenge of individualistic value reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can predict individualistic values with accuracies between 55% and 65%, while a precise description of individualistic value judgments cannot be approximated only via demographic information. |
Don’t Forget Your Reward Values: Language Model Alignment via Value-based Calibration (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating large language models have been criticized for their complexity and instability. |
| Approach: | They propose a value-based calibration method to better align Large Language Models with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing methods on AI assistant and summarization datasets, providing impressive generalizability, robustness, and diversity in different settings. |
Towards Better Value Principles for Large Language Model Alignment: A Systematic Evaluation and Enhancement (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable performance across tasks . alignment with human values is critical for their responsible development. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that evaluates value principles along three desirable properties . they propose supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning-based approaches . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves value principles along the three desirable properties of LLMs. |
Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach for Constructing Value Systems in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have raised concerns regarding their intrinsic values. |
| Approach: | They propose a psychologically grounded five-factor value system for Large Language Models that integrates psychological principles with cutting-edge AI priorities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed value system meets standard psychological criteria, improves LLM safety prediction, and enhances Llm alignment, when compared to the canonical Schwartz’s values. |
Constructing Your Model’s Value Distinction: Towards LLM Alignment with Anchor Words Tuning (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a study of large language models (LLMs) shows that they can generate outputs that are honest, positive, harmless, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that amplifies logits difference between positive and negative tokens . they propose to use the logits gap to generate positive and positive tokens after alignment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves effective alignment, but requires fewer computational resources compared to training-time alignment methods. |
Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Dense Rewards from Language Model Critic (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning (RL) can align language models with non-differentiable reward signals, such as human preferences, but the sparsity of these signals can lead to inefficient and unstable learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes the critique capability of Large Language Models to produce intermediate-step rewards during RL training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves sample efficiency and the overall performance of the policy model, supported by both automatic and human evaluation. |
Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgments (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges to evaluate recommendation systems, search engines, and other subjective tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to align LLM judgments with individual human evaluators or their aggregated judgments without retraining or fine-tuning the LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 142% improvement in agreement across 29 tasks and exceeds inter-human agreement on four out of six tasks. |