| Challenge: | Existing language modeling models treat text sequences as if they were created independently. |
| Approach: | They propose a hierarchical extension to the language modeling problem whereby a human-level exists to connect sequences of documents and capture the notion that human language is moderated by changing human states. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the current state-of-the-art in terms of language modeling and fine-tuning for 4 downstream tasks spanning document- and user-levels. |
Similar Papers
Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yufei Tian, Tenghao Huang, Miri Liu, Derek Jiang, Alexander Spangher, Muhao Chen, Jonathan May, Nanyun Peng
| Challenge: | a recent HCI study has pointed to gaps in machine storytelling ability at the global level . authors show that LLMs have less suspense and less tension than human stories . |
| Approach: | They propose a computational framework to analyze narratives through three discourse-level aspects. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework analyzes narratives through three discourse-level aspects . it shows that LLMs fall short of human abilities in discourse understanding . |
Blackbird language matrices (BLM), a new task for rule-like generalization in neural networks: Can Large Language Models pass the test? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate large language models for generalization lack generalization ability . current methods for evaluating LLMs are based on tests of human intelligence . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a language task to evaluate large language models' generalisation ability . they propose to ask LLMs to solve simple variants of the RAVEN IQ test . |
| Outcome: | The proposed task can be used to evaluate the generalisation ability of large language models . it shows that current generative models can handle the task in the sense that they understand instructions . |
Large Human Language Models: A Need and the Challenges (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a growing recognition of the importance of modeling human and social factors into human-centered NLP models . authors advocate for three positions toward creating large human language models based on psychological and behavioral sciences . |
| Approach: | et al. advocate for three positions toward creating large human language models . they argue that LM training should include the human context and recognize that people are more than their group . |
| Outcome: | a new study shows that learning language from linguistic signals alone is not adequate, according to a recent paper . authors advocate for three positions toward creating large human language models . a human-centered model should include the human context, and account for the dynamic nature of the human environment, they say . |
Plug-in Language Model: Controlling Text Generation with a Simple Regression Model (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large-scale pre-trained language models have demonstrated unrivaled capacity in generating text that closely resembles human-written content. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-in language model that leverages reinforcement learning to adjust latent states to control text generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods that rely on gradient-based, weighted decoding, or prompt-based methods. |
Evaluation of LLMs-based Hidden States as Author Representations for Psychological Human-Centered NLP Tasks (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Many human-centered NLP tasks focus on assessing human-attributes of a user based on their language. |
| Approach: | They evaluate different ways of representing documents and users using different LM and HuLM architectures to predict task outcomes as dynamically changing states and averaged trait-like user-level attributes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed representations predict valence, arousal, empathy, and distress as well as trait-like user-level attributes. |
From Multimodal LLM to Human-level AI: Modality, Instruction, Reasoning, Efficiency and beyond (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial aims to deliver a comprehensive review of cutting-edge research in MLLMs. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will review cutting-edge research in MLLMs and examine the impact of ML in learning and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This course will review cutting-edge research in MLLMs and examine the impact of ML models on learning, learning, and multimodal reasoning. |
Detecting Bot-Generated Text by Characterizing Linguistic Accommodation in Human-Bot Interactions (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language generation models' democratization makes it easier to generate human-like text at-scale for nefarious activities, from spreading misinformation to targeting specific groups with hate speech. |
| Approach: | They propose to use linguistic alignment to detect bot-generated text rather than using it directly. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are more robust across datasets and models if they use information about how people respond to it rather than using the bot's text directly. |
Multimodal Large Language Models for Text-rich Image Understanding: A Comprehensive Review (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pei Fu, Tongkun Guan, Zining Wang, Zhentao Guo, Chen Duan, Hao Sun, Boming Chen, Qianyi Jiang, Jiayao Ma, Kai Zhou, Junfeng Luo
| Challenge: | Recent advances in vision-language models have unified perception and understanding tasks within Visual Question Answering paradigms. |
| Approach: | They propose to outline timeline, architecture, and pipeline of nearly all TIU MLLMs and review their performance on mainstream benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well on mainstream benchmarks and are compared with other models. |
Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on using LLMs to classify text as either human-written or machine-generated . |
| Approach: | They characterize human-written and machine-generated texts using a set of linguistic features across different linguistic levels such as morphology, syntax, and semantics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reveals that human-written texts exhibit simpler syntactic structures and more diverse semantic content. |
CDLM: Cross-Document Language Modeling (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing language models (LMs) provide powerful representations for internal text structure, but there are important applications for multi-text tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a pretraining approach that incorporates two key ideas into the masked language modeling objective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves over existing models and sets of long-range transformers and can be easily applied to multiple multi-text tasks. |