Challenge: Existing dependency parsers for Korean do not perform as well as their English counterparts due to the complexity of Korean's linguistic features.
Approach: They propose a morpheme-based Korean dependency parsing format and propose to adopt it to Universal Dependencies.
Outcome: The proposed format outperforms parsing results for Korean UD treebanks and detailed error analysis.

Similar Papers

Building Universal Dependency Treebanks in Korean (L18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Several treebanks were introduced for Korean, all of which comprised annotation of morphemes and phrase structure trees, each following its own set of guidelines.
Approach: They propose to use Korean treebanks as dependency trees and to analyze their performance using morpheme-level annotations.
Outcome: The Korean portion of the Google UD Treebank, the Penn Korean Treebank and the KAIST Treebank are re-tokenized and assessed for errors.
Towards Standardized Annotation and Parsing for Korean FrameNet (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on Korean FrameNet have focused on English, but annotations are not optimally designed for Korean.
Approach: They propose a morphologically enhanced annotation strategy for Korean FrameNet datasets and parsing by leveraging the CoNLL-U format.
Outcome: The proposed method improves the annotation accuracy of Korean FrameNet datasets and their parsers.
Universal Dependencies Version 2 for Japanese (L18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: UD Japanese resources are built on automatic conversion from several treebanks.
Approach: They propose to port the word delimitation, POS, and syntactic relations of existing treebanks to UD Japanese . they discuss the issues of the UD scheme found through porting of the Japanese language .
Outcome: The proposed UD Japanese resources are based on automatic conversion from treebanks.
Constructing a Dependency Treebank for Second Language Learners of Korean (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a manually annotated syntactic treebank is available for second language learners . the dataset includes 7,530 sentences (66,982 words; 129,333 morphemes)
Approach: They propose to manually annotate syntactic treebanks based on Universal Dependencies from Korean written data.
Outcome: The proposed dataset includes 7,530 sentences and 129,333 morphemes from Korean learners.
Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collection (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Universal Dependencies is an open community effort to create cross-linguistically consistent treebank annotation for many languages.
Approach: They describe version 2 of the universal guidelines and discuss major changes from UD v1 to UD 2 . they propose a morphological layer, a syntactic layer and a word segmentation layer .
Outcome: The proposed treebanks are available for 90 languages and have been updated to meet the needs of multilingual parsers and researchers.
Towards the Conversion of National Corpus of Polish to Universal Dependencies (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a paper aims at enriching the manually annotated part of National Corpus of Polish with a syntactic layer.
Approach: They enrich manually annotated part of Polish National Corpus with a syntactic layer and a UD dependency graph.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms a model trained on a smaller set of gold-standard trees in predicting part-of-speech tags, morphological features, lemmata and labelled dependency trees.
How Universal are Universal Dependencies? Exploiting Syntax for Multilingual Clause-level Sentiment Detection (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new method for clause-level sentiment detection is proposed for multilingual use cases.
Approach: They propose a pipeline method that makes the most of syntactic structures based on Universal Dependencies.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves high precision in sentiment detection for 17 languages . it avoids machine-learning approaches that may cause obstacles to its use cases .
On the Continued Value of Universal Dependencies in the Era of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a growing belief that explicit linguistic representations are no longer necessary is questioned in large language models . a recent study examines whether and in what ways this cross-lingual syntactic framework can still benefit LLMs .
Approach: They use Universal Dependencies (UD) to examine whether and in what ways it can still benefit LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms its syntax-agnostic counterparts in a cross-lingual evaluation task.
CoNLL-UL: Universal Morphological Lattices for Universal Dependency Parsing (L18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using the universal dependencies framework, we address the need for a universal representation of morphological analysis that can capture alternative morphology of surface tokens and is compatible with the segmentation and morphologic annotation guidelines prescribed for UD treebanks.
Approach: They propose a new annotation format for word lattices that represent morphological analyses and a resource that obeys this format for a range of typologically different languages.
Outcome: The proposed model can capture alternative morphological analyses of surface tokens and is compatible with the segmentation and morphology guidelines prescribed for UD treebanks.
Development of a Multilingual CCG Treebank via Universal Dependencies Conversion (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) is a lexicalized grammar formalism that can capture both syntactic and semantic information.
Approach: They propose an algorithm to convert UD treebanks to CCG treebank and propose future extensions.
Outcome: The proposed algorithm performs lexical, sentential, and syntactic rule coverage analysis, as well as CCG parsing experiments.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations