| Challenge: | Existing fact verification datasets with crowdsourced claims introduce subtle biases that are difficult to control for. |
| Approach: | They construct a large-scale fact verification dataset with ambiguous questions . they use a corpus of 188k claims to construct false and true claims . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset outperforms models trained on the dataset FEVER or in-domain data by up to 17% absolute. |
Similar Papers
Automated Fact-Checking of Claims from Wikipedia (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Fact checking datasets such as FEVER and SNLI suffer from limited applicability due to synthetic nature of claims and/or evidence written by annotators that differ from real claims and evidence on the internet. |
| Approach: | They present a dataset of 124k+ triples consisting of a claim, context and an evidence document extracted from English Wikipedia articles and citations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is the largest fact checking dataset consisting of real claims and evidence to date. |
Fact Checking or Psycholinguistics: How to Distinguish Fake and True Claims? (D19-66)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using psycholinguistic features to distinguish lies from true statements is a difficult task and a problem to be solved. |
| Approach: | They compare psycholinguistic text features with fact checking approaches to distinguish lies from true statements using data from a large ongoing study. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform both fact checking and human baselines but the accuracy is not high. |
Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Steady progress has been made in fact-checking and its orthogonal tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use fact-checking explanations to explain predictions by comparing existing explanations against desirable properties to find out what makes for good explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanations are compared against desirable properties and show how they may lead to improvements in the research area. |
Assisting the Human Fact-Checkers: Detecting All Previously Fact-Checked Claims in a Document (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have brought us a proliferation of false claims online, which spread fast . fact-checkers have been using automated fact-finding to verify claims . |
| Approach: | They propose a system that can detect claims that can be fact-checked by a given database . they create a manually annotated document dataset and propose evaluation measures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves sizable performance gains over strong baselines. |
ClaimDB: A Fact Verification Benchmark over Large Structured Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite substantial progress in fact-verification benchmarks, this setting remains largely underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a fact-verification benchmark where evidence for claims is derived from compositions of millions of records and multiple tables. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks score below 55% accuracy with 30 state-of-the-art LLMs and are released on github. |
How Robust are Fact Checking Systems on Colloquial Claims? (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing fact checking systems that perform well on colloquial claims significantly degenerate on collotic claims with the same semantics. |
| Approach: | They propose to transfer the styles of claims from FEVER into colloquialism to investigate fact checking systems on colloqual claims. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system significantly degenerates on colloquial claims with the same semantics. |
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Scientific fact-checking has largely focused on textual and tabular sources, neglecting scientific charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for scientific fact-checking grounded in scientific charts . climateViz comprises 49,862 claims paired with 2,896 visualizations . results show current models struggle to perform fact- checking when statistical reasoning is required . |
| Outcome: | The climateviz benchmark is the first large-scale benchmark for scientific fact-checking . it includes 49,862 claims paired with 2,896 visualizations labeled as support, refute, or not enough . |
A Survey on Automated Fact-Checking (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Fact-checking is an essential task in journalism due to the speed with which information and misinformation can spread in the media ecosystem. |
| Approach: | They propose to use natural language processing to automate fact-checking by identifying common concepts and defining definitions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can predict the veracity of claims using natural language processing, machine learning, and databases. |
MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
Isabelle Augenstein, Christina Lioma, Dongsheng Wang, Lucas Chaves Lima, Casper Hansen, Christian Hansen, Jakob Grue Simonsen
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to verify factual claims are limited by small datasets or artificially constructed datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the largest publicly available dataset of naturally occurring factual claims for automatic claim verification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and evidence pages significantly. |
Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent explosion of false claims in social media has led to manual fact-checking initiatives . however, existing methods are inadequate to deal with the growing number of false content claims. |
| Approach: | They propose to model claims about images using a new dataset to examine the relationship between the image and the claim. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on the baseline and will enable future research on fact-checking claims about images. |