Challenge: Polysynthetic languages are low-resource, lacking large scale annotated datasets needed to build and/or evaluate computational models.
Approach: They propose to use linguistic priors to help with morphological segmentation and part-of-speech tagging tasks for Adyghe and Inuktitut .
Outcome: The proposed methods improve morphological segmentation and part-of-speech tagging tasks on Adyghe and Inuktitut.

Similar Papers

BPE vs. Morphological Segmentation: A Case Study on Machine Translation of Four Polysynthetic Languages (2022.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Morphologically rich polysynthetic languages present a challenge for NLP systems due to data sparsity.
Approach: They propose to use subword segmentation to reduce data sparsity in polysynthetic languages . they compare supervised and unsupervised morphological segmentation methods to Byte-Pair Encodings .
Outcome: The proposed methods outperform BPEs in MT tasks for all language pairs except for Nahuatl . the proposed methods are more efficient than supervised methods, but less sparse in fusional languages.
Unsupervised Stem-based Cross-lingual Part-of-Speech Tagging for Morphologically Rich Low-Resource Languages (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Low-resource languages lack annotated data even for basic syntactic information such as parts of speech.
Approach: They propose an unsupervised cross-lingual approach for POS tagging for low-resource languages of rich morphology . they further investigate morpheme-level alignment and projection and use of linguistic priors for morphological segmentation .
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms the word-based approach and outperfies word-driven approaches.
Fortification of Neural Morphological Segmentation Models for Polysynthetic Minimal-Resource Languages (N18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Morphological segmentation for polysynthetic languages is challenging because of limited training data.
Approach: They propose two new multi-task training approaches that improve performance for Mexican polysynthetic languages . they also propose cross-lingual transfer as a third way to fortify their neural model .
Outcome: The proposed models improve on Mexicanero, Nahuatl, Wixarika and Yorem Nokki . the proposed models reduce the amount of parameters by close to 75% .
Bootstrapping Techniques for Polysynthetic Morphological Analysis (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Polysynthetic languages have exceptionally large and sparse vocabularies due to the number of morpheme slots and combinations in a word.
Approach: They propose linguistically-informed approaches for bootstrapping a neural morphological analyzer . they use a finite state transducer to train an encoder-decoder model .
Outcome: The proposed method improves on a polysynthetic language's model by "hallucinating" missing linguistic structure and resampling from a Zipf distribution to simulate a more natural distribution of morphemes.
Modeling Morphological Typology for Unsupervised Learning of Language Morphology (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to morphological analysis relied on hand-built rules to identify word-internal structures.
Approach: They propose a language-independent model for fully unsupervised morphological analysis that exploits a universal framework leveraging morphology.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing systems on nine typologically and genetically diverse languages and shows superior performance over leading systems.
Morphological Segmentation for Low Resource Languages (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new corpus of annotated morphological data is described for the DARPA LORELEI Program . the data is annotating 9 low resource languages and root information for 7 of the languages .
Approach: This paper describes a new morphology resource created by Linguistic Data Consortium and the University of Pennsylvania for the DARPA LORELEI Program.
Outcome: The annotated corpus provides a gold standard for unsupervised morphological segmenters and analyzers . the language-specific annotation guidelines were language-independent, but included morphology paradigms and other specifications.
MorphAGram, Evaluation and Framework for Unsupervised Morphological Segmentation (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Unsupervised morphological segmentation is beneficial for many natural language processing tasks.
Approach: They propose a framework for unsupervised morphological segmentation that uses Adaptor Grammars.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art results across languages of different typologies, from fusional to polysynthetic and from high-resource to low-resourced.
Language-Independent Approach for Morphological Disambiguation (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches for predicting complex morphological tags treat each analysis as a tag and apply sequence labeling models to perform tagging.
Approach: They propose a language-independent approach which integrates all words, roots, POS and morpheme tags into vectors and computes the inner products between analyses and the contexts.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms existing models on seven different languages while running about 6 and 33 times faster than MarMot and Seq2Seq, respectively.
Morphological Processing of Low-Resource Languages: Where We Are and What’s Next (2022.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for morphological processing are not suitable for low-resource languages, but they are still lacking in the field of computational morphology.
Approach: They propose to bridge two unsupervised models to understand a language’s morphology from raw text alone and propose to use them to improve their models.
Outcome: The proposed models perform reasonably, but there is room for improvement.
Minimally-Supervised Morphological Segmentation using Adaptor Grammars with Linguistic Priors (2021.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Unsupervised morphological segmentation is an essential subtask in many natural language processing applications.
Approach: They introduce two types of priors: grammar definition and linguist-provided affixes . they show that priors boost morphological segmentation performance in a minimally-supervised manner .
Outcome: The proposed priors achieve 8.9% and 34.2% error reductions over the state-of-the-art unsupervised system.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations