Compositional Generalization for Neural Semantic Parsing via Span-level Supervised Attention (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Pengcheng Yin, Hao Fang, Graham Neubig, Adam Pauls, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Yu Su, Sam Thomson, Jacob Andreas
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to compositional generalization in semantic parsers focus on word-level alignments, but they focus on spans. |
| Approach: | They propose a span-level supervised attention loss that improves compositional generalization in semantic parsers by focusing on spans. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on three benchmarks of compositional generalization. |
Similar Papers
Compositional Generalization via Semantic Tagging (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing neural sequence-to-sequence models fail at compositional generalization, i.e., they cannot generalize to unseen compositions of seen components. |
| Approach: | They propose a decoding framework that preserves expressivity and generality of sequence-to-sequence models while featuring lexicon-style alignments and disentangled information processing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves compositional generalization across model architectures, domains, and semantic formalisms on three semantic parsing datasets. |
Improving Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generalization of models to out-of-distribution data has sparked substantial interest . compositional generalization is the ability to systematically generalize to test examples composed of components seen during training . |
| Approach: | They propose to extend compositional generalization in semantic parsing by using contextual representations and training attention to agree with pre-computed token alignments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed extensions improve compositional generalization on OOD compositions. |
Improving Compositional Generalization in Classification Tasks via Structure Annotations (2021.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Compositional generalization is the ability to generalize systematically to a new data distribution by combining known components. |
| Approach: | They propose to convert a natural language sequence-to-sequence dataset into a classification dataset that requires compositional generalization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize compositionally by providing hints on the structure of the input. |
Compositional Generalization by Factorizing Alignment and Translation (2020.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a crucial property underlying the expressive power of human language is its systematicity. |
| Approach: | They propose to make an analogous separation between alignment and translation in neural machine translation to capture compositional structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms existing neural networks on a compositional generalization task without supervision. |
Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalization (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite success of sequence-to-sequence models, they fail in compositional generalization . a span-based parser that predicts a utterance over spans improves performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a span-based parser that predicts a utterance over a given span tree . they propose to use CKY to encode how partial programs compose over spans . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on random splits than baselines that require compositional generalization. |
Learning to Substitute Spans towards Improving Compositional Generalization (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite the rising prevalence of neural sequence models, there is a deficiency in compositional generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a compositional augmentation strategy that enables multi-grained composition of substructures in the whole training set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy outperforms existing strategies on three compositional generalization benchmarks. |
Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on compositional generalization with semantic parsing, but it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization. |
| Approach: | They construct a machine translation dataset that measures compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model struggle more in structural generalization than in compositional generalization. |
Broad-Coverage Semantic Parsing as Transduction (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to broad-coverage semantic parsing are not applicable to all frameworks because of the lack of explicit alignments between tokens in the sentence and nodes in the semantic graph. |
| Approach: | They propose a transduction parsing paradigm that unifies different broad-coverage semantic parsers into a paradigm that leverages multiple attention mechanisms to build meaning representation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves state-of-the-art on AMR, SDP and UCCA and is competitive with the state- of-the art on SDP. |
Improving Span Representation by Efficient Span-Level Attention (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating high-quality span representations are limited by subset of tokens . span-span interactions should play an important role in span encoding, authors argue . |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce span-span interactions and more comprehensive span-token interactions to improve span representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on span-related tasks and shows superior performance. |
Improving Generalization in Language Model-based Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing: Two Simple Semantic Boundary-based Techniques (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models (LMs)2 have been adopted for semantic parsing due to their promising performance and straightforward architectures. |
| Approach: | They propose to use token preprocessing to preserve semantic boundaries of tokens produced by LM tokenizers and special tokens to mark the boundaries of aligned components. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques improve the performance of pre-trained language models on two text-to-SQL semantic parsing datasets. |