Does Pretraining for Summarization Require Knowledge Transfer? (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing theories claim that pretraining models learn linguistic knowledge from the pretraining corpus, but scientific explanations for these benefits remain unknown.
Approach: They propose to use random character n-grams to test models on real corpora to see if the small residual benefit of using real data could be accounted for by the structure of the pretraining task.
Outcome: The proposed task performs on documents consisting of character n-grams, whereas pretrained models perform on real corpora with no residual benefit.

Similar Papers

Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corpora (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dominant practice is to fine tune large pretrained transformer models using smaller downstream datasets . performance gains are not always attributable to the use of external data in massive amounts .
Approach: They propose to use the same (downstream) training data for pretraining and finetuning to compare models.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms standard pretraining on the BookWiki corpus on 7 and 5 datasets.
Is BERT a Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Learner? A Surprising Finding of Pre-trained Models’ Transferability (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using pre-trained language models, we can apply them to specialized domains such as scientific articles or clinical data.
Approach: They propose to pre-train BERT models on large text corpora and use them to generalize to token sequence classification applications.
Outcome: The models pre-trained on text classification tasks perform better than the models using task-specific knowledge and share non-trivial similarities.
How Much Pretraining Does Structured Data Need? (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models are increasingly adopted for handling structured data, despite pretraining on unstructured text.
Approach: They propose to re-initialize subsets of layers with random weights before fine-tuning on structured datasets.
Outcome: The proposed models are compared to unstructured datasets and show that they perform well over structured data.
Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models prerained on text from a wide variety of sources form the foundation of today’s NLP.
Approach: They propose to tailor a pretrained model to the domain of a target task by using domain-adaptive pretraining in-domain.
Outcome: The proposed model can be tailored to the domain of a target task and perform well under both high- and low-resource settings.
Can You Tell Me How to Get Past Sesame Street? Sentence-Level Pretraining Beyond Language Modeling (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: State-of-the-art models in natural language processing (NLP) often incorporate sentence encoder functions which generate a sequence of vectors intended to represent the in-context meaning of each word in an input text.
Approach: They conduct the first large-scale systematic study of candidate pretraining tasks, comparing 19 different tasks as alternatives and complements to language modeling.
Outcome: The proposed model can be used to train sentences on language modeling tasks.
To Pretrain or Not to Pretrain: Examining the Benefits of Pretrainng on Resource Rich Tasks (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on pretraining NLP models with variants of Masked Language Model (MLM) objectives have shown that the number of training samples used in the downstream task is limited.
Approach: They propose to use MLM objectives to pretrain NLP models with variants of Masked Language Model (MLM) objectives to improve accuracy on downstream tasks.
Outcome: The proposed model can reach a diminishing return point as the supervised data size increases significantly.
How much pretraining data do language models need to learn syntax? (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretraining methods are convenient, but expensive in terms of time and resources.
Approach: They investigate the impact of pretraining data size on the syntactic capabilities of RoBERTa by using syntaktic structural probes to determine whether models pretrained on more data encode a higher amount of syntastic information.
Outcome: The proposed models perform better on part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing and paraphrase identification.
Pretrain-KGE: Learning Knowledge Representation from Pretrained Language Models (2020.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing knowledge graph embedding models suffer from limited knowledge representation due to sparse and noisy dataset annotations.
Approach: They propose to use pretrained language models to enhance knowledge representation by leveraging world knowledge from pretrained models.
Outcome: Extensive experiments show that the proposed framework can improve results over existing models.
When Do Pre-Training Biases Propagate to Downstream Tasks? A Case Study in Text Summarization (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that large language models contain linguistic and societal biases, but it is unclear how these biase amplify to downstream tasks.
Approach: They investigate how name-nationality bias propagates from pre-training to downstream tasks . they show that these biases manifest themselves as hallucinations in summarization .
Outcome: The proposed model can reduce the rate of hallucinations, but does not change the types of biases that do appear.
Deciphering the Impact of Pretraining Data on Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have suggested that the composition of the pretraining corpus exerts a significant impact upon the performance of LLMs.
Approach: They analyze the impact of 48 datasets from 5 major categories of pretraining data of Large Language Models and measure their impacts on LLMs using benchmarks about nine major categories.
Outcome: The proposed analysis provides insights into the organization of data to support more efficient pretraining of Large Language Models.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations