| Challenge: | Existing approaches to constituency parsing are based on symbolic engineering, but they are simplified by their adaptive distributed representation. |
| Approach: | They propose two fast combinatory models for constituency parsing: binary and multibranching. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve an F1 score of 92.54 on Penn Treebank, speeding at 1327.2 sents/sec. |
Similar Papers
Discontinuous Combinatory Constituency Parsing (2023.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Discontinuous parsing is more challenging than continuous parsers because children can group with syntactic cousins in the sentence rather than its two adjacent neighbors. |
| Approach: | They extend a pair of combinator-based constituency parsers into a discontinuous pair . they use a swap action and biaffine attention to iteratively compose constituent vectors from word embeddings without any grammar constraints. |
| Outcome: | The proposed parsers achieve state-of-the-art discontinuous accuracy with a significant speed advantage over continuous parsing. |
Straight to the Tree: Constituency Parsing with Neural Syntactic Distance (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Compared to traditional shift-reduce parsing schemes, our approach is free from the potentially disastrous compounding error. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that predicts a scalar for each split position in a sentence and then determines the topology of grammar tree based on syntactic distances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves the state-of-the-art single model F1 score of 92.1 on PTB and 86.4 on CTB dataset, surpassing the previous single model results by a large margin. |
What’s Going On in Neural Constituency Parsers? An Analysis (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of differences have emerged between classical and modern constituency parsing approaches . structural components like grammars and feature-rich lexicons are becoming less central . recurrent neural networks have gained traction as a powerful and general purpose tool for representation . |
| Approach: | They propose a model that implicitly learns to encode much of the same information as grammars and lexicons in the past. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models under similar conditions. |
Cross-Domain Generalization of Neural Constituency Parsers (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural parsers perform well on in-domain benchmarks, but their performance degrades in well-understood ways. |
| Approach: | They analyze generalization on English and Chinese corpora to see if they can generalize to other domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed neural parsers perform better on in-domain benchmarks than on out-of-domain corpora. |
Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inference (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using custom architectures, constituency parsers are limited and require specialized hardware. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that assigns labels to each word in a sentence in parallel and then performs a reconciliation phase to extract a tree in (empirically) linear time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 95.4 F1 on the WSJ test set while also achieving substantial speedups compared to current state-of-the-art parsers with comparable accuracies. |
Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for unsupervised parsing rely on constituency tests . linguists can judge a sentence's grammatical validity by modifying it via some transformation . |
| Approach: | They propose a method for unsupervised parsing based on a constituency test . they specify a set of transformations and use an unsupervised neural acceptability model to make grammaticality decisions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 62.8 F1 on the Penn Treebank test set, an improvement of 7.6 points over the previous best results. |
Dynamic Head Selection for Neural Lexicalized Constituency Parsing (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lexicalized parsing has traditionally been neglected in favor of unlexicalized, span-based methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a latent lexicalization framework that dynamically infers lexicals from data without relying on predefined head-finding rules. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns lexical dependencies directly from data, offering greater adaptability across languages and datasets. |
Revisiting the Practical Effectiveness of Constituency Parse Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Constituency Parse Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models (CPE-PLM) is a new paradigm that attempts to induce constituency parse trees based on the internal knowledge of pre-tried language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use constituency parse trees from pre-trained language models to induce constituency trees by introducing a set of heterogeneous PLMs combined using two advanced ensemble methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is more effective than typical supervised parsers in few-shot settings. |
Parsing Headed Constituencies (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using constituency and dependency trees, syntactic representations are preferred for tasks such as nominal phrase extraction and identification of terminology. |
| Approach: | They propose a parsing technique that generates headed constituency trees which combine information typically contained in constituency and dependency trees. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates headed constituency trees with discontinuities and can generate constituency tree with discontinuity. |
Efficient Constituency Parsing by Pointing (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Constituency parsing is a core task in natural language processing (NLP) Existing methods for constituency paring are greedy transition-based or globally optimized. |
| Approach: | They propose a constituency parsing model that casts the problem into a series of pointing tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 92.78 F1 without pre-trained models, which is faster than existing models. |