| Challenge: | Existing models for commonsense reasoning are limited by their limited set of facts, rendering them unfit for reasoning over new unseen situations and events. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural-symbolic reasoner which can combine commonsense facts with large-scale dynamic CKGs to draw conclusions about ordinary situations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art models on the task of link prediction on CKGs. |
Similar Papers
Great~Truths~are ~Always ~Simple: A Rather Simple Knowledge Encoder for Enhancing the Commonsense Reasoning Capacity of Pre-Trained Models (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to enhance pre-trained language models (PTMs) with a knowledge-aware graph neural network (GNN) encoder that models a commonsense knowledge graph (CSKG) can't explain how external knowledge resources improve the reasoning capacity of PTMs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use relation features from CSKGs to enhance the reasoning capacity of pre-trained language models (PTMs) by encoding a commonsense knowledge graph (CSKG) |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces the parameters for encoding CSKGs and improves on five benchmarks. |
Unsupervised Deep Structured Semantic Models for Commonsense Reasoning (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for commonsense reasoning rely on human-crafted features and knowledge bases, but unsupervised learning is not feasible due to the lack of labeled training data or comprehensive knowledge bases. |
| Approach: | They propose two unsupervised models based on the Deep Structured Semantic Models framework to tackle two commonsense reasoning tasks: Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) and Pronoun Disambiguation (PDP). |
| Outcome: | The proposed models capture contextual information in the sentence and co-reference information between pronouns and nouns, and achieve significant improvement over previous state-of-the-art approaches. |
Towards Unified Representations of Knowledge Graph and Expert Rules for Machine Learning and Reasoning (2022.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical study shows superiority of proposed method over time-tested knowledge-driven and data-driven methods. |
| Approach: | They propose a cognitive knowledge graph that unifies expert rules and relational facts as the substrate of machine learning and reasoning models. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show the proposed method superior to time-tested methods . the proposed model can perform both learning and reasoning with labeled data . |
Conversational Multi-Hop Reasoning with Neural Commonsense Knowledge and Symbolic Logic Rules (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, conversational agents lack commonsense reasoning, preventing them from engaging in rich conversations with humans. |
| Approach: | They propose a commonsense reasoning system that uncovers unstated presumptions from user commands satisfying a general template of if-(state), then-(action), because-(goal) They propose to use a transformer-based generative commons sense knowledge base as its source of background knowledge to extract multi-hop reasoning chains from the neural KB. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves a 35% higher success rate than existing methods with human users. |
I Know What You Asked: Graph Path Learning using AMR for Commonsense Reasoning (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a large amount of pre-defined commonsense knowledge is available for commonsensense reasoning . humans acquire commonsence in their lives, but machines cannot learn commonseense without assistance. |
| Approach: | They propose an AMR-ConceptNet-Pruned (ACP) graph that is pruned from a full integrated graph . they show that the ACP graph interprets the reasoning path and predicts the correct answer . |
| Outcome: | The proposed graph outperforms baseline models in the commonsenseQA task . it shows that the reasoning path can be interpreted with the relations and concepts provided by the graph . |
Do Language Models Perform Generalizable Commonsense Inference? (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has applied pretrained language models to populate commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs) but there is a lack of understanding on their generalization to multiple CKGs, unseen relations, and novel entities. |
| Approach: | They analyze the ability of pretrained language models to perform generalizable commonsense inference in terms of knowledge capacity, transferability and induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can adapt to different schemas defined by multiple CKGs but fail to generalize to new relations. |
Structured Self-Supervised Pretraining for Commonsense Knowledge Graph Completion (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches focus on generating concepts that have direct and obvious relationships with existing concepts and lack an ability to generate unobvious concepts. |
| Approach: | They propose a general graph-to-paths pretraining framework that leverages high-order structures in CKGs to capture high-level relationships between concepts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can capture high-order relationships between concepts in four special cases: long path, path-to-path, router, and graph-node-path. |
Com2 : A Causal-Guided Benchmark for Exploring Complex Commonsense Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Yixin Cao, Yuxiong Yan, Li Du, Yufei Zhang, Jinglong Gao, Jiaqian Liu, Bing Qin, Ting Liu
| Challenge: | Existing works focus on complex tasks like math and code, while complex commonsense reasoning remains underexplored due to its uncertainty and lack of structure. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a benchmark for large language models based on complex commonsense reasoning based upon causal event graphs and causal theory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark combines a complex commonsense reasoning benchmark with a detective story to achieve a more challenging subset. |
Commonsense Reasoning for Natural Language Processing (2020.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we will outline the various types of commonsense knowledge and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide researchers with the critical foundations and recent advances in commonsense representation and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will outline the various types of commonsense and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge while highlighting the challenges specific to this type of knowledge (e.g., reporting bias). |
Learning from Missing Relations: Contrastive Learning with Commonsense Knowledge Graphs for Commonsense Inference (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to commonsense inference lack coverage and expressive diversity of commonsensense knowledge graphs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that contrasts sets of semantically similar and dissimilar events . they propose 'solar' framework that can be used to learn commonsense inference . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art commonsense transformer on commonsensense inference by 1.84% on average among 8 metrics. |